Toyo NanoEnergy R38 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Toyo NanoEnergy R38 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 21 + 0 road tests and 12,691 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 is ahead, 82–70

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport 4

Summer

Tests 84 · 21 tests Owners 74 · 12,691 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)

“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”

Toyo NanoEnergy R38
Tire BToyo

NanoEnergy R38

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 86

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 +15
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests89≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8172

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 88.5 + 40% × 81.1 = 86

    NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 87

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 +15
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests92≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8173

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 91.5 + 40% × 80.5 = 87

    NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72

    No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 78

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 +9
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests83≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7169

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 71.3 = 78

    NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 73

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests73–
    Reviews found online73–

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 72.8 = 73

  5. 70

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests76≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6165

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 61 = 70

    NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4NanoEnergy R38
    Reviews found online7871
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Toyo NanoEnergy R38: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 4Toyo NanoEnergy R38
Relative Score 82 70
Dry 86 71
Wet 87 72
Comfort 78 69
Noise 73 –
Treadwear 70 65
Handling (owners) 78 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Pilot Sport 4

NanoEnergy R38

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving

Cons

  • Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
  • Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 review

Tire B NanoEnergy R38

Pros

  • Reliable wet and dry grip with predictable handling limits
  • Good value for money compared to premium brand alternatives
  • Solid longevity and mileage, with respectable tread wear reported

Cons

  • Slightly increased road noise reported by some users
  • Limited size or availability challenges noted by consumers wanting replacements
All owner themes in the NanoEnergy R38 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires

Based on 246 community posts

Tire B

Toyo NanoEnergy R38

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 B · Toyo NanoEnergy R38
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available62—
Rim diameters16″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Toyo NanoEnergy R38

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better dry, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo NanoEnergy R38 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 86 vs 71 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 87 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 78 vs 69 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 78 vs 71 on handling.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy R38

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 4 or NanoEnergy R38?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 or NanoEnergy R38?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 87 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 or NanoEnergy R38?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 86 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 or NanoEnergy R38?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 78 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 or NanoEnergy R38?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 70 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology