Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 10 road tests and 12,714 + 165 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 is ahead, 81–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 85 · 21 tests Owners 76 · 12,714 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)

“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”

Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Tire BYokohama

Advan Sport V107

Summer

± 6

Tests 70 · 10 tests Owners 57 · 165 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 87

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 +2
    85
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Advan Sport V107
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 10 tests8998
    Reviews found online8465

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 89.3 + 40% × 83.9 = 87

    Advan Sport V107: 60% × 97.6 + 40% × 65 = 85

  2. 89

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 +14
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Advan Sport V107
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 10 tests9283
    Reviews found online8464

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 84.4 = 89

    Advan Sport V107: 60% × 82.5 + 40% × 63.8 = 75

  3. 76

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 +29
    47
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Advan Sport V107
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 3 tests8242
    Reviews found online7250

    Pilot Sport 4: 40% × 81.6 + 60% × 71.7 = 76

    Advan Sport V107: 40% × 41.9 + 60% × 50 = 47

  4. 70

    Noise

    Pilot Sport 4 +20
    50
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Advan Sport V107
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 5 tests7343
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)61

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70

    Advan Sport V107: 60% × 43.3 + 40% × 61.1 = 50

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 71

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 +26
    45
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Advan Sport V107
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 4 tests7847
    Reviews found online6042

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71

    Advan Sport V107: 60% × 46.6 + 40% × 42.3 = 45

  6. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 +16
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Advan Sport V107
    Reviews found online8165
  7. 76

    Efficiency

    Pilot Sport 4 +66
    10
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Advan Sport V107
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 7 tests7610
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 4Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Relative Score 81 65
Dry 87 85
Wet 89 75
Comfort 76 47
Noise 70 50
Treadwear 71 45
Handling (owners) 81 65
Efficiency 76 10

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Pilot Sport 4

± 6

Advan Sport V107

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPilot Sport 4Advan Sport V107ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 80% #3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 96% #4/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 80% #3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 100% #1/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 90% #2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 99% #2/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 80% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 83% #14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 80% #2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 96% #3/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 70% #8/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 82% #27/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 97% #4/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test 94% #20/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 70% #4/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 96% #6/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 78% #7/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 96% #6/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 70% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 92% #6/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Noise Noise 99% #6/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test 97% #16/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 96% #5/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 71% #15/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 80% #2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 78% #7/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 66% #7/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test 74% #13/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #16/20 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test #20/20 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 59% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 78% #11/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #7/9 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 #18/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving

Cons

  • Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
  • Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 review

Tire B Advan Sport V107

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and high-speed stability
  • Stiff sidewalls providing direct and responsive steering
  • Competitively priced compared to tier-1 performance alternatives

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan (often lasting between 5,000 to 12,000 miles)
  • Noticeable road noise on certain rough or worn highway surfaces
  • Reduced grip in very cold temperatures or standing water as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Advan Sport V107 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.

r/JettaGLI ·59 upvotes ·2026-09-27

“Reminder: Tires are the key to this car Just replaced my Michelin Pilot Sport 4 AS tires with a new set ahead of the rainy season. Lasted 36K miles. It was the best mod to the car and a fresh set reminded just how good a brand new set is. The car is glued to the road, riding wonderfully smooth and quiet. Spend the money, get the best tires for you. The tune can wait. And it will need it.”

r/BoltEV ·5 upvotes ·2026-04-29

“Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires are noisy (a followup) I have been asked on this sub if the PS4 tires on my wife’s Bolt are noisy, and I wasn’t sure how to answer. Well, we made two 60-mile round trips this past weekend, mostly on highways with 55 and 70 mph speed limits, and I have to say that the tires are kind of noisy. Certainly not as quiet as EV-oriented tires are. The grip is fantastic, so we really like them. If you are sensitive to noise, though, these Max Performance class tires are probably not for you.”

f30.bimmerpost.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by weston.__ I will be going down the non-rft route, Pilot Sport 4. You're not the only one to say the ride quality with non-rft is a massive improvement and this is the reason why I will change once the time comes. I went from Bridgestone S001 RFT to 'go-flats' and have found the suppleness an obvious difference. Since I put the pressure to the mid point between the low and high load plated pressures I have yet to have any of the heartstopping thumps come through the suspension that the Bridgestone seemed prone to.”

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires

Based on 246 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Advan Sport V107

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 B · Yokohama Advan Sport V107
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available62136
Rim diameters16″ – 20″16″ – 24″
Tread depth—8/32″
UTQG300 - 320 A - AA A240 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common3434

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Yokohama Advan Sport V107

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better efficiency, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 76 vs 10 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 76 vs 47 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 71 vs 45 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 70 vs 50 on noise.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport V107

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 4 or Advan Sport V107?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 or Advan Sport V107?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 89 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 or Advan Sport V107?

Neither, by our numbers: 87 vs 85 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Pilot Sport 4 or Advan Sport V107?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 70 vs 50 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 or Advan Sport V107?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 76 vs 47 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 or Advan Sport V107?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 71 vs 45 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Pilot Sport 4 or Advan Sport V107?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 76 vs 10 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology