Tests 84 · 23 tests Owners 82 · 6,449 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (subj. dry handling)
“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”
Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Toyo Proxes RA1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 23 + 0 road tests and 6,449 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 83–69
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
89
Dry
Pilot Sport 5 +1475Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes RA1 Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / – tests 92 ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 84 79 Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.2 + 40% × 83.8 = 89
Proxes RA1: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75
No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
90
Wet
Pilot Sport 5 +2664Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes RA1 Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / – tests 92 ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 87 61 Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.4 + 40% × 86.7 = 90
Proxes RA1: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64
No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison49Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes RA1 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online – 34 Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.4 = 49
No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
75
Comfort
Pilot Sport 5 +867Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes RA1 Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests 71 ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 81 66 Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 71 + 40% × 80.6 = 75
Proxes RA1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
47
Noise
Proxes RA1 +2168Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes RA1 Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests 33 ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) 70 Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.2 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 47
Proxes RA1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
82
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 5 +1567Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes RA1 Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests 87 ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 75 68 Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 74.7 = 82
Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
83
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 5 +1073Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes RA1 Reviews found online 83 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 69 |
| Dry | 89 | 75 |
| Wet | 90 | 64 |
| Snow | – | 49 |
| Comfort | 75 | 67 |
| Noise | 47 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 82 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 83 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Pilot Sport 5
69
/ 100
Proxes RA1
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport 5
Pros
- Outstanding wet and dry traction with high resistance to aquaplaning
- Superior tread life and longevity compared to competitors and previous generations
- Noticeable improvements in ride comfort and a quieter cabin over rough road surfaces
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to initial steering vagueness or understeer during hard cornering
- Higher price point compared to some tier-one competitors
- Performance and grip degrade significantly under intense track heat or heavy circuit use
Tire B Proxes RA1
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip that remains consistent even as the tread wears down.
- Superior tire life compared to many other dedicated track-focused compounds.
- Predictable breakaway characteristics that provide driver confidence at the limit.
Cons
- Performance can become 'greasy' if the tire is overdriven or overheated during long sessions.
- Requires proper heat cycling and break-in procedures to achieve optimal performance.
- Sensitive to alignment settings, which can lead to accelerated or uneven wear if not managed.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Community opinion on the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is overwhelmingly positive for daily street driving, praising its exceptional wet grip, tread longevity, and quiet comfort compared to run-flats and older performance tires. However, several enthusiasts note downsides for aggressive or track use, specifically citing softer sidewalls, muted steering feedback, and poor heat resistance leading to delamination under track conditions. Most drivers consider it an outstanding premium all-rounder for sporty street cars rather than a dedicated track or extreme-performance tire.
r/DubaiPetrolHeads
·3 upvotes ·2025-07-15
“Had both on my ST. The 4S is more performance oriented but it wore out much quicker in approximately 35k kms. PS5 is more comfortable and the wear is slower however it does get noisy towards its end of life. After the 2 sets of Michelins, I tried the Falken FK520 for half the cost of the Michelins but found it to more comfortable for daily driving as it is comparatively softer.”
cliosport.net
·5 upvotes ·2024-02-07
“I’ve done 20k on a set of fronts that still have ~2-2.5mm left. They’re wearing very well IMO.”
f30.bimmerpost.com
“I've used the PS4S, potenza s001's & sports contact 7. Currently on Pilot Sport 5's and I think they're the best all road "do it all"road tyre I've had on my RWD . The asymmetric 6 is also supposed to be great but I havent tried that.”
Top themes
#wet grip performance#tread wear longevity#daily driving comfort#track heat delamination#soft sidewall steering feedback#road noise levels#comparison with ps4s
Based on 174 community posts
Tire B
Toyo Proxes RA1
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | B · Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 66 | 7 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 100 AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
69
/ 100
Toyo Proxes RA1
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better wet, treadwear and dry. Pick the Toyo Proxes RA1 if noise matters most to you. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 90 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 68 vs 47 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 82 vs 67 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 89 vs 75 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Tire B · Toyo Proxes RA1
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Sport 5 or Proxes RA1?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 5 or Proxes RA1?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 90 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 5 or Proxes RA1?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 89 vs 75 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Pilot Sport 5 or Proxes RA1?
Toyo Proxes RA1, 68 vs 47 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 5 or Proxes RA1?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 75 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 5 or Proxes RA1?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 82 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology