Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 88 · 6,469 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 23 + 11 road tests and 6,469 + 251 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 87–75
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 11 tests Owners 80 · 251 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
Key facts
- In 8 tests that measured dry braking for both, Pilot Sport 5 won 4 and Proxes Sport 2 won 2 (average 97% vs 97% of the best).
- In 8 tests that measured wet braking for both, Pilot Sport 5 won 8 and Proxes Sport 2 won 0 (average 95% vs 90% of the best).
- In 6 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, Pilot Sport 5 won 3 and Proxes Sport 2 won 2 (average 97% vs 96% of the best).
- In 5 tests that measured dry handling for both, Pilot Sport 5 won 4 and Proxes Sport 2 won 1 (average 99% vs 98% of the best).
- In 5 tests that measured wet handling for both, Pilot Sport 5 won 5 and Proxes Sport 2 won 0 (average 98% vs 97% of the best).
-
92
Dry
Pilot Sport 5 +785Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes Sport 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 11 tests 93 88 Reviews found online 91 81 Dry Braking (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 4–2 97% 97% Dry Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 4–1 99% 98% Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 100% 92% Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 90.8 = 92
Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 80.7 = 85
-
94
Wet
Pilot Sport 5 +1183Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes Sport 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 11 tests 94 83 Reviews found online 94 84 Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 86% 86% Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 3–2 97% 96% Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 96% 83% Wet Braking (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 8–0 95% 90% Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 97% 91% Wet Circle (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 99% 99% Wet Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–0 98% 97% Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 94.1 + 40% × 93.6 = 94
Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 83 + 40% × 84 = 83
-
79
Comfort
Pilot Sport 5 +673Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes Sport 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 3 tests 71 71 Reviews found online 85 75 Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–0 87% 87% Pilot Sport 5: 40% × 71 + 60% × 84.7 = 79
Proxes Sport 2: 40% × 71.1 + 60% × 74.8 = 73
-
47
Noise
Proxes Sport 2 +2572Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes Sport 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 7 tests 33 72 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) 73 Noise (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–5 96% 98% Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 47
Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 72 + 40% × 73.2 = 72
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
87
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 5 +3255Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes Sport 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 4 tests 92 40 Reviews found online 79 78 Abrasion (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 87% 64% Wear (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–0 87% 55% Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 91.9 + 40% × 78.7 = 87
Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 39.7 + 40% × 77.8 = 55
-
89
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 5 +881Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes Sport 2 Reviews found online 89 81 -
64
Efficiency
Pilot Sport 5 +1648Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 5 Proxes Sport 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 8 tests 64 48 Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 95% 95% Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 4–1 86% 83%
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | Toyo Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 87 | 75 |
| Dry | 92 | 85 |
| Wet | 94 | 83 |
| Comfort | 79 | 73 |
| Noise | 47 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 89 | 81 |
| Efficiency | 64 | 48 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
87
/ 100
Pilot Sport 5
75
/ 100
Proxes Sport 2
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 8 tests that ran both, Michelin Pilot Sport 5 finished ahead 8 times and Toyo Proxes Sport 2 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Pilot Sport 5 | Proxes Sport 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% | 97% | +0.3 | 4–2 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? · 245/45 R19 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 98% | +0.9 | 4–1 in 5 shared tests Newest: Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers · 225/45 R18 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 100% | 92% | +7.9 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers · 225/45 R18 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 86% | 86% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% | 96% | +0.1 | 3–2 in 6 shared tests Newest: Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers · 225/45 R18 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% | 90% | +5.8 | 8–0 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? · 245/45 R19 |
| Wet Braking (concrete) | Wet | 97% | 91% | +6.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 99% | 99% | +0.5 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R18 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% | 97% | +1.5 | 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers · 225/45 R18 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 96% | 83% | +12.9 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers · 225/45 R18 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 87% | 87% | +0.5 | 1–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers · 225/45 R18 |
| Noise | Noise | 96% | 98% | −1.7 | 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 87% | 64% | +23.5 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 87% | 55% | +31.5 | 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 95% | 95% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 86% | 83% | +2.7 | 4–1 in 5 shared tests Newest: Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers · 225/45 R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 57% | 73% | −16.3 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #13/20 | #18/20 | – | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Value | Cost | 65% | 56% | +9.2 | 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #9/50 | #16/50 | – | 8–0 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? · 245/45 R19 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport 5
Pros
- Outstanding wet and dry traction with high resistance to aquaplaning
- Superior tread life and longevity compared to competitors and previous generations
- Noticeable improvements in ride comfort and a quieter cabin over rough road surfaces
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to initial steering vagueness or understeer during hard cornering
- Higher price point compared to some tier-one competitors
- Performance and grip degrade significantly under intense track heat or heavy circuit use
Tire B Proxes Sport 2
Pros
- Exceptional grip in both dry and wet conditions
- High value for money compared to premium competitors like Michelin and Continental
- Precise steering response and predictable handling
Cons
- Faster than average treadwear or short mileage lifespan reported by some drivers
- Higher road noise levels noted on certain wider sizes or as the tire wears
- Slightly reduced traction in cold or heavy standing water once the tread wears down
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
The community generally views the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 as an exceptional daily-driving tire that bridges the gap between high performance and everyday comfort. Users frequently praise its outstanding wet grip, low road noise, and impressive tread life compared to more track-focused alternatives like the PS4S. However, some enthusiast drivers feel the sidewalls and feedback can feel a bit numb or soft for aggressive track use, noting it is built more for sporty road use than dedicated circuit driving.
r/CarTrackDays
·17 upvotes ·2025-05-25
“Michelin PS5 Delaminating Near new PS5, running a low speed track, and the fronts basically fell apart after 2 sessions. I know these aren't track-focussed tires, but is this really expected for them? Looks like the tires got too hot, but I'm just shocked how poorly they performed on a stock car (Golf R). Not sure if it's worth contacting Michelin over this or not. Read more”
r/kereta
·9 upvotes ·2025-12-15
“Have to replace my tyres soon, MC7 or PS5? Hi guys, I need to replace the tyres on my civic soon and I’m stuck between the MC7 and the PS5. I not a guy who will driving 180km/h in raining day so i think both performance is good enough for me. I did some research, it seems like MC7 have better performance overall. Also found that MC7 is cheaper than PS5 in my country (around RM600-700 cheaper for 4 tyres). I prefer tread life > noise/ comfort > performance (rarely drive over 120). Any feedback on the 2 brands would be super helpful. Thanks! === UPDATED === Thank you all for suggestions and opinions. So at the end i pick the MC7. Reasons: It’s possibly quieter compared to the PS5 The price is cheaper and come with 1 year premium (or what name i forgot) warranty There’s a Continental authorized dealer near my place I’ve never tried Continental before, so I decided to give it a try At the moment, the driving experience is a bit quieter than the previous PS4 (which is expected since it’s a new tire). As for performance, I haven’t really pushed it to the limit, but it’s more than sufficient for me, didn’t experience any wheel spin or loss of traction so far. One thing I do notice is that I can constantly hear small stones sticking to the tire and hitting the wheel arch which is very annoying. Also, on a personal note, I still prefer the sidewall shape of the PS5, so it took me some time to get used to the rounded sidewall of the MC7 Read more”
r/abarth
·3 upvotes ·2026-05-10
“Great tires, used to run the stock Pirellis but the ride comfort was atrocious and there was really no performance benefit so I switched them for some PS5.”
Top themes
#Wet grip and safety#Tread life and durability#Road noise and comfort#Daily driving performance#Soft sidewall feedback#Comparison to PS4S and competitors#Value and pricing
Based on 177 community posts
Tire B
Mixed
Toyo Proxes Sport 2
Community discussions regarding the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 are relatively limited due to it being a newly released tire, with many users asking for comparisons against established premium options. Owners generally report positive impressions regarding value for money and performance, though some express concerns over faster-than-expected treadwear. Additionally, frequent naming confusion occurs across automotive forums where 'PS2' references the legacy Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 rather than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2025-08-31
“I have Toyo proxes sport 2 on a mustang gt. Very happy with them. The kumho ecstasy sport s is supposed to be better in every way though. Continental extreme contact sport 2 is one of the best ultra high performance/summer performance available right now but a but more expensive.. Michelin makes excellent tires, but competition is getting tight for them. Hard to justify the price now adays”
mbworld.org
“Had conti 2's on my audi s4 and they were downright terrible. Traction was good for about a month and then they just got loud and sloppy. Went to the ps2's after about 15k miles and abosultely loved them. Dry traction was improved greatly as was ride comfort and noise. They only lasted 20,000 miles but well worth the investment. I've never had a good experience with any continental tire so I can't imagine the sc3's being worth a gamble as they are not cheap.”
r/TyreReviews
·17 upvotes ·2026-08-27
“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money.”
Top themes
#value for money#limited market reviews#treadwear and longevity#comparison with competitors#dry and roll grip#naming ambiguity
Based on 17 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | B · Toyo Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 66 | 113 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 52 | 52 |
Which one should you actually buy?
87
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
75
/ 100
Toyo Proxes Sport 2
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better treadwear, efficiency and wet. Pick the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 87 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Toyo Proxes Sport 2 scores 72 vs 47 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want lower fuel or energy use
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 64 vs 48 on efficiency.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 94 vs 83 on wet.
Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Tire B · Toyo Proxes Sport 2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Sport 5 or Proxes Sport 2?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 5 or Proxes Sport 2?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 94 vs 83 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 5 or Proxes Sport 2?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 92 vs 85 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Pilot Sport 5 or Proxes Sport 2?
Toyo Proxes Sport 2, 72 vs 47 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 5 or Proxes Sport 2?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 79 vs 73 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 5 or Proxes Sport 2?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 87 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Pilot Sport 5 or Proxes Sport 2?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 64 vs 48 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology