Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 88 · 6,469 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”
Vredestein Ultrac Cento looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 23 + 0 road tests and 6,469 + 23 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 90–71
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 88 · 6,469 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 23 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / – tests | 93 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 91 | 71 |
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 90.8 = 92
Ultrac Cento: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 70
No road tests of dry for Ultrac Cento. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / – tests | 94 | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 94 | 74 |
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 94.1 + 40% × 93.6 = 94
Ultrac Cento: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 73
No road tests of wet for Ultrac Cento. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests | 71 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 85 | 71 |
Pilot Sport 5: 40% × 71 + 60% × 84.7 = 79
Ultrac Cento: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.4 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Ultrac Cento. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests | 33 | – |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | – |
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 47
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests | 92 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 75 |
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 91.9 + 40% × 78.7 = 87
Ultrac Cento: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Cento. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 89 | 69 |
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests | 64 | – |
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | Vredestein Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 90 | 71 |
| Dry | 92 | 70 |
| Wet | 94 | 73 |
| Comfort | 79 | 71 |
| Noise | 47 | – |
| Treadwear | 87 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 89 | 69 |
| Efficiency | 64 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Pilot Sport 5
Ultrac Cento
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Cento | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #9/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | #27/49 2014 Auto Bild 50 Summer Tyre Shootout | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally views the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 as an exceptional daily-driving tire that bridges the gap between high performance and everyday comfort. Users frequently praise its outstanding wet grip, low road noise, and impressive tread life compared to more track-focused alternatives like the PS4S. However, some enthusiast drivers feel the sidewalls and feedback can feel a bit numb or soft for aggressive track use, noting it is built more for sporty road use than dedicated circuit driving.
“I had PS5’s on they were great literally all the grip you could ever want (not a very powerful car) and they have an incredibly long life span, I didn’t find them loud at all and i also now have an Audi a5 coupe and the car itself blocks out most noise especially if you have music on so it’s not something you should worry about, I know the Asym6 have more grip but it’s marginal I’d personally get the ps5’s just because of the beautiful side wall!”
“look at camskill,always the cheapest,ive just gotten the michelin ps5 for my M4 ,not fitted yet as my conti sport 7 still have life,only bought last month as there was a cashback offer from michelin at camskill,i got £80 so got 2 x 275-35-19 and x2 255-35-19 for £617 delivered,”
“PS5 is a very good allround, comfortable but grippy tire. PS4S has a stiffer sidewall and is way sportier but harsher. There is to date no successor for the PS4S. I switched from PS4S to PS5 on my mustang and its a way better fit for a daily tire. I would remommend to get PS5 for the rear aswell.”
Based on 177 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | B · Vredestein Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 66 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Vredestein Ultrac Cento
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 92 vs 70 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 94 vs 73 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 89 vs 69 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 87 vs 72 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 94 vs 73 on our wet score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 92 vs 70 on our dry score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 79 vs 71 on our comfort score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 87 vs 72 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology