Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 658 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 33 road tests and 658 + 21,761 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 88–71
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 87 · 33 tests Owners 87 · 21,761 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)
“We downsized from 21” stock on GTline to 20” rims and put on the CC2s—can’t stand the ugly stock rims and plastic covers. It got so much quieter that we noticed we could turn the radio down from 6 to 4 on the secondary roads, and down from 8 to 5 on the highway. Efficiency improved slightly, possibly due to lighter weight wheels.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
CrossClimate 2 +2195Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3+ CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 31 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 99 Reviews found online 77 88 Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 74
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.2 + 40% × 88.3 = 95
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
78
Wet
CrossClimate 2 +987Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3+ CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 31 tests ≈ 76 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 80 92 Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 78
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 91.8 = 87
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
60
Snow
CrossClimate 2 +3191Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3+ CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 27 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 99 Reviews found online 53 79 Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.5 = 60
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.6 + 40% × 78.7 = 91
No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
63
Comfort
CrossClimate 2 +1679Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3+ CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 60 86 Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60 = 63
CrossClimate 2: 40% × 67.1 + 60% × 86.1 = 79
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison79Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3+ CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests – 77 Reviews found online – 83 CrossClimate 2: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 82.5 = 79
-
69
Treadwear
CrossClimate 2 +1584Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3+ CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests 73 81 Reviews found online 64 88 Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 63.5 = 69
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84
-
67
Handling (owners)
CrossClimate 2 +1582Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3+ CrossClimate 2 Reviews found online 67 82 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison90Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3+ CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests – 90
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 88 |
| Dry | 74 | 95 |
| Wet | 78 | 87 |
| Snow | 60 | 91 |
| Comfort | 63 | 79 |
| Noise | – | 79 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 84 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 82 |
| Efficiency | – | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Pilot Sport A/S 3+
88
/ 100
CrossClimate 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | CrossClimate 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | #2/6 2026 Wybór Kierowców Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Pros
- Dry and wet grip, cornering, and steering response, with many reviewers describing it as close to a summer tire. Wet traction and hydroplaning resistance are especially praised.
- Large improvement over OEM tires (Pirelli, Bridgestone, Goodyear, Dunlop, Continental) and especially over run-flats, with better ride, handling and often less noise.
- Good light-snow and cold-weather capability for an ultra-high-performance all-season tire, which lets owners avoid separate summer and winter sets.
Cons
- Premature treadwear is the most common complaint. Many report 10k–25k miles, rear tires and staggered setups wearing fastest, and some cases of tread chunking, flaking, cracking or dry rot. Many call the 45k warranty unrealistic.
- Road noise, including humming, droning or roaring around 60–75 mph. It often worsens with wear, and some reviewers say it is among the loudest tires they have owned.
- Weak snow and ice traction for some owners. Some describe it as unsafe, especially in deeper snow or on RWD cars, and say it falls short of the marketed winter rating.
Tire B CrossClimate 2
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
- Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
- Long-lasting tread wear and durability
Cons
- Higher initial purchase price
- Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
- Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Community members widely praise the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ for its dry handling, wet grip, and substantial improvement in ride comfort over stock tires. However, several users express reservations about its poor traction in genuine snow conditions and note that road noise can become prominent as the tread wears. It is frequently compared against competitors like the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 as well as its successor, the Pilot Sport All Season 4.
bobistheoilguy.com
·2 upvotes ·2024-03-01
“Slam me if you must, but I bought the Falken Azenis FK460 A/S in size 255-40x19 for my 2016 Mustang GT, based largely on Tire Rack testing and their customer comments. First thing I noticed was they are quieter than my old Michelin Pilot Sport A/S3+ tires, which were noisy when new and got worse. Also, the rear tires don't want to slip out like the Michelins when I get on the gas through a tight turn. However, the Michelins had been on the car for >6 years and 27K miles. But other than than the two categories above, it's hard for me to discern a lot of difference. Maybe it's only in my head, but perhaps the Michelins were a bit more responsive to quick motions at the steering wheel. I have no idea how well the Falkens will perform after 20K miles, but for me that's probably 4 years from now. Fair or not, I shied away from the Contis because I had read about balancing issues on a couple websites.”
r/WRX
·28 upvotes ·2017-12-19
“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”
r/GolfGTI
·4 upvotes ·2020-02-14
“Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Tires just installed Just got the tires on this morning with an alignment and proper balancing. Holy cow, night and day difference from the original Bridgestones on the car. Car handles so much better. It honestly makes me feel like I just bought a new car. If you have any questions or are considering getting them, feel free to ask!”
Top themes
#Dry cornering grip#Wet traction performance#Snow traction limitations#Road noise over time#Ride comfort comparison#Balancing and tire pressure#Comparison to Continental DWS
Based on 47 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Michelin CrossClimate 2
The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.
teslamotorsclub.com
·3 upvotes ·2024-04-28
“I have 60K miles on my 2019 Model X. The General is my 3rd set of tires, replacing the Michelin Cross Climate 2 that was on the car. In 200 miles, here is what I have learned so far with these General G-Max AS-07 Noise = The General is FAR superior than the Michelin Cross Climate. Matter of fact, the General is very close to the OEM Conti in this area Range = The General is running around 5% more in terms of efficiency (or lack of) compare to the OEM Conti and worn Michelin, but 5-10% more than my Michelin NEW. I only started getting the efficiency on the Michelin when the inside turned bald. Comfort = The ride is on par with the Michelin and OEM Conti, none really rode that great to begin with. Michelin was probably the best, the General is probably the worst but it isn't anything terrible. Performance = Sorry it is a Model X and it is my daily driver. I don't drive it hard enough to have any thoughts on it. Price = The General is less than $800 after rebate, Michelin and Conti are probably over $1500 at this point.”
r/TeslaModel3
·2 upvotes ·2025-11-20
“I live in Vancouver,WA and the CC2 are great for our climate even the light snowfall. I have an SR+, so they’re the 18” version. I have about 22K miles on them after 2 years and have averaged 240Wh/mi since installation, and I don’t drive conservatively. They did increase power usage by about 15-20Wh/mi. I’ve also been lazy and haven’t rotated them and they still are wearing very well. Got about 8/32nd up front and 6/32 in rear. Much better than the stock tires that were almost worn out at 22K. Note that places like Costco will not install these on your Tesla because they don’t meet the factory speed rating. It’s a CYA thing.”
r/Ioniq5
·2 upvotes ·2025-07-26
“I got my new to me 2022 Ultimate RWD in May this year, the tyres were all crap so I went to CrossClimate 2s on all 4 wheels. I can’t tell you what it was doing beforehand but I get 3.7mi/kWh around town and 3.2mi/kWh on the motorway now. I have a fairly heavy right foot, but at 100% charge it shows 270ish miles but mine is an early 72kWh battery so bear that in mind.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design
Based on 762 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 2 | 92 |
| Rim diameters | 21″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 500 AA A | 640 B A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
88
/ 100
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better snow, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 91 vs 60 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 74 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 79 vs 63 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 84 vs 69 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or CrossClimate 2?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 87 vs 78 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 74 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 91 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology