Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 121 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport A/S 3 is ahead, 76–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +17
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3Ventus V12 evo K110
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online8256

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 81.9 = 77

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.6 = 60

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 80

    Wet

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +20
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3Ventus V12 evo K110
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online8456

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 78 (est.) + 40% × 84 = 80

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 60

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Snow

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +21
    50
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3Ventus V12 evo K110
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7135

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 71.2 = 71

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.1 = 50

    No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +10
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3Ventus V12 evo K110
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7156

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 70.6 = 70

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 40% × 66.1 (est.) + 60% × 55.7 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3Ventus V12 evo K110
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–52

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 60

    No road tests of noise for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +13
    57
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3Ventus V12 evo K110
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online7251

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 70

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +18
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3Ventus V12 evo K110
    Reviews found online8163
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport A/S 3Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
Relative Score 76 58
Dry 77 60
Wet 80 60
Snow 71 50
Comfort 70 60
Noise – 60
Treadwear 70 57
Handling (owners) 81 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Pilot Sport A/S 3

± 8

Ventus V12 evo K110

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport A/S 3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Outstanding cornering stability and steering responsiveness
  • Stiff sidewalls providing superior handling compared to competitors

Cons

  • Noticeable and bothersome road noise
  • Heavy tire construction
  • Shorter than expected tread life for certain drivers on abrasive surfaces
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport A/S 3 review

Tire B Ventus V12 evo K110

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium brand alternatives
  • Strong, confident dry grip and handling performance
  • Low road noise and high comfort levels

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and a squirmy feel
  • Faster-than-average tread wear
  • Subpar wet weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning as tread wears down
All owner themes in the Ventus V12 evo K110 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6—
Rim diameters19″ – 20″—
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG500 AA A280 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 — better snow, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 71 vs 50 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 80 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 81 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 77 vs 60 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport A/S 3 or Ventus V12 evo K110?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or Ventus V12 evo K110?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 80 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or Ventus V12 evo K110?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 77 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or Ventus V12 evo K110?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 71 vs 50 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or Ventus V12 evo K110?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 70 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or Ventus V12 evo K110?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 70 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology