Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 7 reviews
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 vs Kumho Ecsta PS91 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Pilot Sport A/S 3 is ahead, 76–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 6 tests Owners 47 · 485 reviews
“Mine are 275/40/18, but I had them on 10" wheels. IMO, that's the ideal daily driver size, particularly if you run them on 9.5's.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
78
Dry
Pilot Sport A/S 3 +1068Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Ecsta PS91 Professional tests (TWG score) – 76 Reviews found online 83 57 -
79
Wet
Pilot Sport A/S 3 +1069Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Ecsta PS91 Professional tests (TWG score) – 77 Reviews found online 83 55 -
70
Snow
Pilot Sport A/S 3 +3238Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Ecsta PS91 Reviews found online 70 17 -
71
Comfort
Pilot Sport A/S 3 +1061Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Ecsta PS91 Reviews found online 73 53 -
–
Noise
No comparison66Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Ecsta PS91 Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online – 54 -
70
Treadwear
Pilot Sport A/S 3 +2149Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Ecsta PS91 Reviews found online 72 37 -
83
Handling
Pilot Sport A/S 3 +2657Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Ecsta PS91 Reviews found online 83 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 | Kumho Ecsta PS91 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 58 |
| Dry | 78 | 68 |
| Wet | 79 | 69 |
| Snow | 70 | 38 |
| Comfort | 71 | 61 |
| Noise | – | 66 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 49 |
| Handling | 83 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Pilot Sport A/S 3
Ecsta PS91
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport A/S 3
Pros
- Exceptional grip in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding cornering stability and steering responsiveness
- Stiff sidewalls providing superior handling compared to competitors
Cons
- Noticeable and bothersome road noise
- Heavy tire construction
- Shorter than expected tread life for certain drivers on abrasive surfaces
Tire B Ecsta PS91
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip providing high confidence during spirited driving
- Significantly more affordable than premium flagship alternatives while offering comparable performance
- Stiff sidewalls enhance steering response, cornering stability, and feedback
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan, particularly with aggressive driving or on heavier vehicles
- Stiff sidewalls result in a firmer, less comfortable ride that transmits road imperfections
- Tendency to tramline or follow road grooves on straight highways
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Kumho Ecsta PS91
The Kumho Ecsta PS91 is widely praised as an affordable, budget-friendly summer tire with attractive styling and respectable wet or daily street performance compared to pricier rivals like Michelin. However, several users express frustration with poor tread life, rapid wear, and insufficient grip or heat endurance under hard driving and track conditions. Others also note issues with sketchy handling, flat-spotting, or vibration when cold.
“90% used Michelin super sports or New Kumho ecsta ps91. I am juggling between either getting a set of used 90% tread Michelin pss or 4s... or getting some new kumho ecsta ps91s. I’ve always thought Michelin had the best ride and profile appearance even in a high end sport tire but of course the price. If I go used they are about the same price as a set of new kumho. I have never tried the ps91 but they look like Michelin’s even the recessed rim guard looks similar and many reviews say performance and ride is similar.”
“275/40 Square Can Fit on a Sedan Shout out to TireRack for having great information on actual tire size. Ecsta PS91 265/40 and ExtremeContact 275/40 has a tread width and section width difference of 0.1” and 0.2” respectively. Tires fit just about perfect. No rubbing so far, and don’t expect it to rub bc of the relatively minimal width change Really goes to show that tire brand matters for fitment Read more”
“Follow up on new wheels/tires for ZHP Well new wheels and tires are on aswell as aligned. I love the tire and fitment setup but really do not like the gunmetal grey color especially on imola. I will feel it out for a while but probably eventually powder coat to OEM silver. Wheels specs are 18 x 8.5 x ET50 with 255/35/18 Kuhmo Ecsta PS91 all around. -2.5 camber in the front and -2.8 in the rear.”
Based on 45 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 | B · Kumho Ecsta PS91 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 6 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 20″ | 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 260 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3
Kumho Ecsta PS91
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 — better snow, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 70 vs 38 on snow.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 83 vs 57 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 70 vs 49 on treadwear.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 78 vs 68 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.