Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 7 reviews
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 vs Toyo Proxes Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 20 road tests and 7 + 1,277 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport A/S 3 is ahead, 76–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 58 · 20 tests Owners 53 · 1,277 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Had the older version on an SRT8. Grip & performance were great. But wear was not. 10K miles(2 rotations) is all I got.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
Pilot Sport A/S 3 +1562Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 61 Reviews found online 82 64 Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.3 = 77
Proxes Sport: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 64.1 = 62
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
81
Wet
Pilot Sport A/S 3 +1170Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 78 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 84 59 Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 78.1 (est.) + 40% × 84.1 = 81
Proxes Sport: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 59.4 = 70
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Snow
Pilot Sport A/S 3 +3833Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 48 (est.) Reviews found online 72 10 Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 71
Proxes Sport: 60% × 48 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 33
No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Proxes Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
71
Comfort
Pilot Sport A/S 3 +1556Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 50 Reviews found online 71 59 Pilot Sport A/S 3: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.2 = 71
Proxes Sport: 40% × 50.1 + 60% × 59.4 = 56
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison71Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests – 72 Reviews found online – 69 Proxes Sport: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 68.6 = 71
-
69
Treadwear
Pilot Sport A/S 3 +2643Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 36 Reviews found online 71 54 Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 69
Proxes Sport: 60% × 35.5 + 40% × 54.2 = 43
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
82
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport A/S 3 +2656Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Proxes Sport Reviews found online 82 56 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison41Why this score
Source Pilot Sport A/S 3 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests – 41
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 | Toyo Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 56 |
| Dry | 77 | 62 |
| Wet | 81 | 70 |
| Snow | 71 | 33 |
| Comfort | 71 | 56 |
| Noise | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 43 |
| Handling (owners) | 82 | 56 |
| Efficiency | – | 41 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Pilot Sport A/S 3
Proxes Sport
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport A/S 3
Pros
- Exceptional grip in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding cornering stability and steering responsiveness
- Stiff sidewalls providing superior handling compared to competitors
Cons
- Noticeable and bothersome road noise
- Heavy tire construction
- Shorter than expected tread life for certain drivers on abrasive surfaces
Tire B Proxes Sport
Pros
- Significantly more affordable than premium tier summer tires while offering around 80-90% of the performance
- Commendable grip and handling in dry conditions with a progressive, predictable breakaway
- Low road noise and generally high ride comfort compared to factory run-flats or older performance tires
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, with multiple users reporting replacement necessary between 6,000 and 12,000 miles
- Inconsistent or slippery wet-weather traction and occasional tendency to hydroplane in heavy standing water
- Stiff sidewalls on certain sizes leading to a harsher ride quality or increased noise for some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Toyo Proxes Sport
Community sentiment toward the Toyo Proxes Sport family is generally positive, with drivers praising its ride comfort, good value for money, and competent daily street grip. Many owners appreciate unique size options like 345/25-20 for high-performance cars, though enthusiasts note that dedicated track tires offer superior turn-in sharpness and ultimate traction. A common topic of discussion is the scarcity of extensive real-world reviews, particularly regarding newer variants.
“I have real world experience with the Toyo Proxes Sport AS+. This may be the best all around tire on the planet IMO. I'm old and so I've tried multiple tires in real world conditions as a daily driver with performance in mind. I know every Michelin and Pirelli. I've become an expert on available tires in the USA.. What you will find with This tire: * They are immediately quiet *Resist hydroplaning in big water * Higher than expected dry performance in super hot weather for an AS * Maintain tread pattern to the death and remain quiet. These tires are next level.”
“I finally got Toyo Proxes Sport tires to replace my old Michelins. I up sized with 295/30-19's front and 345/25-20's rear on the stock wheels. I really like the fitment and don't have any rubbing even being lowered on the stock jacking bolts. I'm amazed how well they hook although I don't have a good reference as the 9-year-old Michelins were like rocks LOL. The ride is a bit better as well on non-run-flats.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by Brian Goodwin I own both the Falken and Toyo Proxes Sport, both in 235/40-17. The Toyo rides better, the Falken goes faster through the turns, and turn-in response is much quicker. I have not bothered to take the Toyo to the track because around our fun canyon roads it is clearly slower and with less grip than the Falken. The Falken feels like a race tire, complete with stiff sidewall support for crisp turn-in, used those for track and autocross over the last few months, including two wins in class at autocross. The Toyo feels like a street tire, much like the Continental ECS, complete with much lower weight because sidewalls are comparatively soft and squishy next to the Falken. If you want a soft daily driver 235/40 and you accept it is a few clicks slower than the Falken, the Toyo is great as a daily driver. But if you expect that Toyo to keep up with the Falken on track days, you will be disappointed. Great feedback, thanks Brian. Wish there were more options in this size! May just stick with the RT660s, especially now with the HKS GT2 on the car”
Based on 34 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 | B · Toyo Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 6 | 83 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 20″ | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3
Toyo Proxes Sport
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 — better snow, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 71 vs 33 on snow.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 69 vs 43 on treadwear.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 82 vs 56 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 77 vs 62 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Sport A/S 3 or Proxes Sport?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or Proxes Sport?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 81 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or Proxes Sport?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 77 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or Proxes Sport?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 71 vs 33 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or Proxes Sport?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 71 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or Proxes Sport?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 69 vs 43 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology