Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 9 + 40 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect is ahead, 70–60

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect
± 6

Tests 73 · 3 tests Owners 66 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 10 in 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect +17
    57
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 ConnectADVAN Neova AD08RS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests74≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online7651

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 75.5 = 74

    ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 57

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect +11
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 ConnectADVAN Neova AD08RS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests74≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6858

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 68.4 = 72

    ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect +9
    58
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 ConnectADVAN Neova AD08RS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6653

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 65.8 = 67

    ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 53 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 ConnectADVAN Neova AD08RS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 60% × 70 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 59

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Neova AD08RS +8
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 ConnectADVAN Neova AD08RS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5467

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 59

    ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect +15
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 ConnectADVAN Neova AD08RS
    Reviews found online7459
  7. 67

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 ConnectADVAN Neova AD08RS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests67–
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 ConnectYokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Relative Score 70 60
Dry 74 57
Wet 72 61
Comfort 67 58
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 59 67
Handling (owners) 74 59
Efficiency 67 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect

± 8

ADVAN Neova AD08RS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect

Pros

  • Significant lap time improvements and reliable dry grip
  • Enhanced wet performance and aquaplaning resistance compared to predecessor tires
  • Surprising daily driving comfort and compliance

Cons

  • Initial tread scrubbing and vibration when brand new
  • Can struggle under extremely high track temperatures (e.g., 54C)
  • Some users reported soft sidewalls or vague feedback near the limit
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect review

Tire B ADVAN Neova AD08RS

Pros

  • Exceptional treadwear longevity and durability
  • Stiff, robust sidewalls providing precise turn-in response
  • Good wet performance and hydroplaning resistance for a sporty tire

Cons

  • Noticeably lower dry grip and higher limits compared to the older AD08R
  • Prone to loud squealing early before reaching true limits
  • Harder compound can feel unpredictable or slippery when cold or in wet conditions
All owner themes in the ADVAN Neova AD08RS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—35
Rim diameters—14″ – 19″

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect — better dry, handling and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect scores 74 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect scores 74 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect scores 72 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect scores 67 vs 58 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect or ADVAN Neova AD08RS?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect or ADVAN Neova AD08RS?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect, 72 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect or ADVAN Neova AD08RS?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect, 74 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect or ADVAN Neova AD08RS?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect, 67 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect or ADVAN Neova AD08RS?

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS, 67 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology