Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 43 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Pilot Sport vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 43 + 2,192 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport leads, 73–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,192 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
Pilot Sport +374Why this score
Source Pilot Sport ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 82 67 Pilot Sport: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 81.6 = 77
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 74
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
76
Wet
Pilot Sport +868Why this score
Source Pilot Sport ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 75 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 78 64 Pilot Sport: 60% × 74.8 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 76
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 64 = 68
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison34Why this score
Source Pilot Sport ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 49 (est.) Reviews found online – 13 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 49 (est.) + 40% × 12.7 = 34
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
68
Comfort
Pilot Sport +662Why this score
Source Pilot Sport ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 68 62 Pilot Sport: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 68 = 68
ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.5 + 60% × 61.5 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Pilot Sport ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 75 Reviews found online – 60 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 60 = 69
-
64
Treadwear
ADVAN Fleva V701 +569Why this score
Source Pilot Sport ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 63 59 Pilot Sport: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 64
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 59.3 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
76
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport +472Why this score
Source Pilot Sport ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online 76 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source Pilot Sport ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 70 |
| Dry | 77 | 74 |
| Wet | 76 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 34 |
| Comfort | 68 | 62 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Pilot Sport
70
/ 100
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip and handling performance
- Stiff sidewalls providing sharp steering feedback and turn-in
- Good wet weather performance and water channeling
Cons
- Higher price point compared to competitors
- Increased road noise, particularly on rough or chipped road surfaces
- Subpar grip and traction when tires are cold
Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
- Precise steering response and good road feedback
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Michelin Pilot Sport
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
r/mr2
·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
r/Civic_Type_R
·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 2 | 70 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport
70
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Narrow edge: Michelin Pilot Sport — better wet, comfort and dry. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport scores 76 vs 68 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport scores 68 vs 62 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport scores 77 vs 74 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Sport or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Michelin Pilot Sport, 76 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Michelin Pilot Sport, 77 vs 74 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Michelin Pilot Sport, 68 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology