Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 16 reviews
Michelin Power Cup Evo looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Michelin Power 5 vs Michelin Power Cup Evo — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 16 + 2 owner reviews. How we score
Power 5 leads, 71–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 67 · 2 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Power 5 +368Why this score
Source Power 5 Power Cup Evo Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 73 69 Power 5: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
Power Cup Evo: 60% × 67 + 40% × 69.2 = 68
No road tests of dry for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
74
Wet
Power 5 +569Why this score
Source Power 5 Power Cup Evo Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 69 Power 5: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74
Power Cup Evo: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
No road tests of wet for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Power Cup Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Comfort
Power 5 +467Why this score
Source Power 5 Power Cup Evo Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 72 67 Power 5: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 71.7 = 71
Power Cup Evo: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.9 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Power Cup Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Level64Why this score
Source Power 5 Power Cup Evo Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 62 63 Power 5: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64
Power Cup Evo: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Power Cup Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
73
Handling (owners)
Power 5 +469Why this score
Source Power 5 Power Cup Evo Reviews found online 73 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Power 5 | Michelin Power Cup Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 68 |
| Dry | 71 | 68 |
| Wet | 74 | 69 |
| Comfort | 71 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Power 5
Power Cup Evo
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Power 5
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and stability in standing water
- Rapid warm-up times, even in cooler ambient temperatures
- Agile handling and predictable cornering behavior on public roads
Cons
- Tendency for the rear tire to square off prematurely
- Inconsistent performance and grip degradation as the tire reaches the end of its life
- Lack of confidence at maximum lean angles compared to dedicated track tires
Tire B Power Cup Evo
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and handling characteristics
- Performance comparable to dedicated slick tires
- Strong suitability for high-performance chassis setups
Cons
- Limited wet weather performance compared to all-season or dedicated wet-weather tires
- Performance gap when compared to more versatile street-focused tires like the Pilot Sport 4S
- Potential for rapid wear depending on the intensity of the driving style
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Power 5 | B · Michelin Power Cup Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Power 5
Michelin Power Cup Evo
Narrow edge: Michelin Power 5 — better wet, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Power 5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Power Cup Evo rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Power 5 scores 74 vs 69 on wet.
Michelin Power 5 scores 71 vs 67 on comfort.
Michelin Power 5 scores 71 vs 68 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Power 5 or Power Cup Evo?
Which is better in the wet, Power 5 or Power Cup Evo?
Michelin Power 5, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Power 5 or Power Cup Evo?
Michelin Power 5, 71 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Power 5 or Power Cup Evo?
Michelin Power 5, 71 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Power 5 or Power Cup Evo?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology