tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Premier A/S vs Michelin Primacy MXM4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 7 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Premier A/S 62, Primacy MXM4 61.

Check price on Amazon · Premier A/S Check price on Amazon · Primacy MXM4
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Premier A/S
Tire AMichelin

Premier A/S

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 7 reviews

Michelin Primacy MXM4
Tire BMichelin

Primacy MXM4

All Season

± 7Provisional

Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 54 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Primacy MXM4 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePremier A/SPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)87
    Reviews found online6352

    Premier A/S: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 65

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 51.9 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Premier A/S +11
    57
    Why this score
    SourcePremier A/SPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)56
    Reviews found online6758

    Premier A/S: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 56.1 + 40% × 57.5 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 59

    Snow

    Premier A/S +3
    56
    Why this score
    SourcePremier A/SPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5248

    Premier A/S: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 59

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 56

    No road tests of snow for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    Premier A/S +7
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePremier A/SPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)64
    Reviews found online5848

    Premier A/S: 40% × 67.2 (est.) + 60% × 58.4 = 62

    Primacy MXM4: 40% × 63.9 + 60% × 48.3 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for Premier A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePremier A/SPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–82
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 76

    No owner ratings of noise for Primacy MXM4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 47

    Treadwear

    Primacy MXM4 +15
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePremier A/SPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online3459

    Premier A/S: 60% × 55 (est.) + 40% × 34.1 = 47

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    Premier A/S +11
    50
    Why this score
    SourcePremier A/SPrimacy MXM4
    Reviews found online6150
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePremier A/SPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–55
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin Premier A/SMichelin Primacy MXM4
Relative Score 62 61
Dry 65 73
Wet 68 57
Snow 59 56
Comfort 62 55
Noise – 76
Treadwear 47 62
Handling (owners) 61 50
Efficiency – 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Premier A/S

± 7

Primacy MXM4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Premier A/S

Pros

  • Comfortable ride quality with effective bump damping
  • Predictable and precise handling in dry conditions
  • Good center-line tracking and steering feedback

Cons

  • Disappointing tread life and premature wear
  • Poor traction and confidence in snow and ice
  • Susceptibility to hydroplaning at highway speeds
All owner themes in the Premier A/S review

Tire B Primacy MXM4

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
  • Strong tread life and durability
  • High fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
  • Noticeable understeer when cornering
  • Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
All owner themes in the Primacy MXM4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Premier A/S B · Michelin Primacy MXM4
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Premier A/S

Michelin Primacy MXM4

Too close to call: Michelin Premier A/S and Michelin Primacy MXM4 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Premier A/S is stronger on wet, handling and comfort. Michelin Primacy MXM4 is stronger on treadwear and dry. Michelin Premier A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Primacy MXM4 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 62 vs 47 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Premier A/S scores 68 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Premier A/S scores 61 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 73 vs 65 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin Premier A/S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Primacy MXM4
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Premier A/S or Primacy MXM4?

Which is better in the wet, Premier A/S or Primacy MXM4?

Michelin Premier A/S, 68 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Premier A/S or Primacy MXM4?

Michelin Primacy MXM4, 73 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Premier A/S or Primacy MXM4?

Michelin Premier A/S, 59 vs 56 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Premier A/S or Primacy MXM4?

Michelin Premier A/S, 62 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Premier A/S or Primacy MXM4?

Michelin Primacy MXM4, 62 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology