Tests 85 · 10 tests Owners 71 · 40 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)
Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 10 + 0 road tests and 40 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
78
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy 4+ ArrowSpeed Performance UHP Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests 82 – Reviews found online 71 – Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.4 + 40% × 71 = 78
-
79
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy 4+ ArrowSpeed Performance UHP Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests 82 – Reviews found online 75 – Primacy 4+: 60% × 82 + 40% × 74.6 = 79
-
71
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy 4+ ArrowSpeed Performance UHP Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 73 – Reviews found online 69 – Primacy 4+: 40% × 72.9 + 60% × 69.4 = 71
-
72
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy 4+ ArrowSpeed Performance UHP Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests 76 – Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) – Primacy 4+: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72
No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
85
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy 4+ ArrowSpeed Performance UHP Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests 95 – Reviews found online 70 – Primacy 4+: 60% × 94.9 + 40% × 69.7 = 85
-
67
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy 4+ ArrowSpeed Performance UHP Reviews found online 67 – -
78
Efficiency
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy 4+ ArrowSpeed Performance UHP Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests 78 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Primacy 4+ | Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | – |
| Dry | 78 | – |
| Wet | 79 | – |
| Comfort | 71 | – |
| Noise | 72 | – |
| Treadwear | 85 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | – |
| Efficiency | 78 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
Primacy 4+
–
/ 100
ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Primacy 4+
Pros
- Strong wet and dry grip and braking confidence, often cited as a big improvement over Bridgestone, Dunlop and Nexen tyres, including on powerful cars and PHEVs that previously spun their tyres
- Comfortable, compliant ride with soft sidewalls that suits softly sprung and family cars
- Low and even tread wear, with several owners reporting little visible wear after 5,000–10,000 miles and one reporting about 60,000 km in hot climates
Cons
- Road noise and drone, especially on rough asphalt, was described as severe by several owners (Skoda Yeti, Lexus), contradicting other reports of quiet running
- Reduced grip and confidence in cold, damp conditions, with two UK owners saying the tyre behaves like a budget tyre
- Premium pricing, with some owners questioning value when life fell short of expectations
Tire B ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Cons
- Severe lack of traction and grip
- Excessive road noise
- Poor structural integrity and sidewall stability
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Primacy 4+ | B · Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 66 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Michelin Primacy 4+
–
/ 100
Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Only Michelin Primacy 4+ has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Michelin Primacy 4+
Tire B · Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology