tirewheelguide

Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP vs Continental SportContact 7 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 22 road tests and 1 + 1,628 owner reviews. How we score

Check price on Amazon · ArrowSpeed Performance UHP Check price on Amazon · SportContact 7
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental SportContact 7
Tire BContinental

SportContact 7

Summer

± 5

Tests 84 · 22 tests Owners 83 · 1,628 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“On my 2nd set. Got decent mileage from them. 15k miles from the first set of rears and i've 11k on the 2nd set with 4.5mm still left on them.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    97
    Why this score
    SourceArrowSpeed Performance UHPSportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests–100
    Reviews found online–92

    SportContact 7: 60% × 99.9 + 40% × 91.5 = 97

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    95
    Why this score
    SourceArrowSpeed Performance UHPSportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests–96
    Reviews found online–93

    SportContact 7: 60% × 95.5 + 40% × 93.3 = 95

  3. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceArrowSpeed Performance UHPSportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests–56
    Reviews found online–80

    SportContact 7: 40% × 55.8 + 60% × 79.5 = 70

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceArrowSpeed Performance UHPSportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests–59
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    SportContact 7: 60% × 59.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 62

    No owner ratings of noise for SportContact 7. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceArrowSpeed Performance UHPSportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–72
    Reviews found online–64

    SportContact 7: 60% × 72 + 40% × 63.9 = 69

  6. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    91
    Why this score
    SourceArrowSpeed Performance UHPSportContact 7
    Reviews found online–91
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceArrowSpeed Performance UHPSportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests–72
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHPContinental SportContact 7
Relative Score – 86
Dry – 97
Wet – 95
Comfort – 70
Noise – 62
Treadwear – 69
Handling (owners) – 91
Efficiency – 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ArrowSpeed Performance UHP

± 5

SportContact 7

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ArrowSpeed Performance UHP

Cons

  • Severe lack of traction and grip
  • Excessive road noise
  • Poor structural integrity and sidewall stability
All owner themes in the ArrowSpeed Performance UHP review

Tire B SportContact 7

Pros

  • Phenomenal wet and dry grip with high cornering limits
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Strong braking performance and high stability at speed

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear, especially with spirited driving or track use
  • Stiff sidewalls can contribute to a harsher, bumpier ride
  • Elevated road noise reported on certain road surfaces
All owner themes in the SportContact 7 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Continental SportContact 7

Positive

Community members widely praise the Continental SportContact 7 for outstanding dry and wet grip, sharp steering precision, and strong value compared to key rivals like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. However, users frequently highlight faster tread wear, reduced initial tread depth, and occasional issues with road noise and comfort as main drawbacks.

bimmerforums.co.uk ·1 upvote ·2024-05-10

“and they don't have Bridgestone tyre model in both sizes I need. I guess it means I'm back to Camskill and consider either Turanza 6 Enliten or Conti Sport Contact 7. Both got good scores on TyreReviews.com. I could get whole set of Turanzas from Camskill, whereas with Continentals, I would need to buy rear ones elsewhere”
r/i30N ·7 upvotes ·2026-05-31

“The oil and tires question (summer edition) So, I have an EU i30N with GPF (for now anyway) I’m looking for a good summer oil for daily + weekend hooning + a few track days. Ambient temps can reach ~37°C, so I’m considering 5W-30, 5W-40, or maybe 0W-40, over the stock 0W30. Since it's (momentarily) got a GPF, it can't be a full-SAPS oil. Does anyone have any specific recommendations? Next thing is the tires. It's currently on some kind of P Zeros, probably just a later set of the stock model (from the previous owner). I'm looking to put something else onto it (cause I'm fed up with cold understeer and hop), but there's too much choice for me 😅. I know that I probably don't want SC7's because they're reportedly really stiff (despite all of their other pros). The roads are kinda ass where I live and it's already on the limit of my tolerance with the PZs. Read more”
forums.m3cutters.co.uk ·6 upvotes ·2024-01-29

“On my 2nd set. Got decent mileage from them. 15k miles from the first set of rears and i've 11k on the 2nd set with 4.5mm still left on them.”
Top themes
#exceptional dry grip#wet weather performance#rapid tread wear#michelin ps4s comparison#value and pricing#steering precision feedback#road noise levels

Based on 114 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP B · Continental SportContact 7
CategorySummer High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—123
Rim diameters—18″ – 24″
Tread depth—8 - 9/32″
UTQG—240 AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP

Continental SportContact 7

Only Continental SportContact 7 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental SportContact 7
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology