Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Primacy 4 vs Yokohama AVS Sport — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 23 + 0 road tests and 13,381 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Primacy 4 is ahead, 79–74

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Primacy 4
Tire AMichelin

Primacy 4

Summer

Tests 83 · 23 tests Owners 74 · 13,381 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“Well my answer is none of the above. You choose, they are all a lottery imo. I just bought some Michelin Primacy 4 for mine today. Size 215/55 R18”

Yokohama AVS Sport
Tire BYokohama

AVS Sport

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 81

    Dry

    Primacy 4 +6
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4AVS Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / – tests85≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7480

    Primacy 4: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 73.9 = 81

    AVS Sport: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for AVS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 81

    Wet

    Primacy 4 +7
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4AVS Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / – tests85≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7675

    Primacy 4: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 76.2 = 81

    AVS Sport: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 74

    No road tests of wet for AVS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 76

    Comfort

    Primacy 4 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4AVS Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests76≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7473

    Primacy 4: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 74.2 = 76

    AVS Sport: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for AVS Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4AVS Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests74–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Primacy 4: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 77

    Treadwear

    Primacy 4 +9
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4AVS Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests82≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7170

    Primacy 4: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 70.6 = 77

    AVS Sport: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for AVS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 74

    Handling (owners)

    AVS Sport +6
    80
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4AVS Sport
    Reviews found online7480
Scores at a glance
Michelin Primacy 4 vs Yokohama AVS Sport: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Primacy 4Yokohama AVS Sport
Relative Score 79 74
Dry 81 75
Wet 81 74
Comfort 76 71
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 77 68
Handling (owners) 74 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Primacy 4

AVS Sport

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Primacy 4

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability
  • Low road noise and a very quiet, comfortable ride
  • Reliable and consistent wet and dry grip

Cons

  • Vague, numb, or floaty steering feel with soft sidewalls under hard cornering
  • High price point compared to competitors
  • Occasional reports of increased road noise or harsher ride as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Primacy 4 review

Tire B AVS Sport

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet weather traction
  • High level of handling precision and cornering confidence
  • Impressive tread life relative to its performance category

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise, particularly during the first half of the tread life
  • Limited availability due to the tire being out of production
  • Performance degradation noted when tread depth reaches the final 2mm
All owner themes in the AVS Sport review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Primacy 4

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Michelin Primacy 4 is generally positive, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfort, and dependable wet and dry braking performance. Several owners note impressive longevity reaching over 50,000 to 70,000 km, though some EV and SUV drivers report accelerated wear and fragile sidewalls over rough terrain. It is commonly viewed as a premium touring tire that commands high prices compared to competitors.

Top themes
#tread life and longevity#cabin noise and comfort#wet and dry grip#comparisons with Pilot Sport#EV tire performance#sidewall damage and punctures#premium pricing

Based on 44 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama AVS Sport

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Primacy 4 B · Yokohama AVS Sport
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available57—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Primacy 4

Yokohama AVS Sport

Winner: Michelin Primacy 4 — better treadwear, wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama AVS Sport if handling matters most to you. Yokohama AVS Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Primacy 4 scores 77 vs 68 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Primacy 4 scores 81 vs 74 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Primacy 4 scores 81 vs 75 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama AVS Sport scores 80 vs 74 on handling.

Tire A · Michelin Primacy 4
Tire B · Yokohama AVS Sport

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Primacy 4 or AVS Sport?

Which is better in the wet, Primacy 4 or AVS Sport?

Michelin Primacy 4, 81 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Primacy 4 or AVS Sport?

Michelin Primacy 4, 81 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Primacy 4 or AVS Sport?

Michelin Primacy 4, 76 vs 71 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Primacy 4 or AVS Sport?

Michelin Primacy 4, 77 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology