Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 12 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Primacy LC vs Falken ZE914 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 99 owner reviews. How we score
ZE914 is ahead, 73–66
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
ZE914 +974Why this score
Source Primacy LC ZE914 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 64 77 Primacy LC: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65
ZE914: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 74
No road tests of dry for Primacy LC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
69
Wet
ZE914 +574Why this score
Source Primacy LC ZE914 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 69 76 Primacy LC: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.3 = 69
ZE914: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 74
No road tests of wet for Primacy LC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Comfort
ZE914 +271Why this score
Source Primacy LC ZE914 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 70 72 Primacy LC: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69
ZE914: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Primacy LC or ZE914. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Treadwear
ZE914 +568Why this score
Source Primacy LC ZE914 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 61 70 Primacy LC: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63
ZE914: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Primacy LC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
60
Handling (owners)
ZE914 +1575Why this score
Source Primacy LC ZE914 Reviews found online 60 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Primacy LC | Falken ZE914 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 73 |
| Dry | 65 | 74 |
| Wet | 69 | 74 |
| Comfort | 69 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Primacy LC
73
/ 100
ZE914
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Primacy LC
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and quiet operation
- High level of ride comfort and cushioning
- Low rolling resistance contributing to improved fuel economy
Cons
- Soft sidewalls leading to increased body roll and wobbling
- Vulnerability to damage from potholes and road hazards
- High price point relative to some competitors
Tire B ZE914
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Progressive handling characteristics that provide driver confidence
Cons
- Reports of increased road noise, particularly as the tread wears down
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Occasional reports of poor wet-weather traction on specific high-torque or lightweight sports vehicles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Primacy LC | B · Falken ZE914 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Michelin Primacy LC
73
/ 100
Falken ZE914
Winner: Falken ZE914 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Primacy LC rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken ZE914 scores 75 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken ZE914 scores 74 vs 65 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken ZE914 scores 74 vs 69 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Falken ZE914 scores 68 vs 63 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin Primacy LC
Tire B · Falken ZE914
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Primacy LC or ZE914?
Which is better in the wet, Primacy LC or ZE914?
Falken ZE914, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Primacy LC or ZE914?
Falken ZE914, 74 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Primacy LC or ZE914?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Primacy LC or ZE914?
Falken ZE914, 68 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology