Tests 67 · 1 test Owners – · none yet
Michelin X Ice Snow+ vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 0 + 0 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: X Ice Snow+ and Hakkapeliitta 01 are level at 67.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners – · none yet
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test (noise (tester's mark))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
X Ice Snow+ +854Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta 01 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 61 50 Reviews found online ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) X Ice Snow+: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 65 (est.) = 62
Hakkapeliitta 01: 60% × 50.1 + 40% × 60.6 (est.) = 54
No owner ratings of dry for X Ice Snow+. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No owner ratings of dry for Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
Level71Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta 01 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 71 71 Reviews found online ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) X Ice Snow+: 60% × 71 + 40% × 70.9 (est.) = 71
Hakkapeliitta 01: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 70.6 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of wet for X Ice Snow+. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No owner ratings of wet for Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
Hakkapeliitta 01 +775Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta 01 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 68 77 Reviews found online ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) X Ice Snow+: 60% × 67.7 + 40% × 69.6 (est.) = 68
Hakkapeliitta 01: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 72.5 (est.) = 75
No owner ratings of snow for X Ice Snow+. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No owner ratings of snow for Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
70
Comfort
X Ice Snow+ +862Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta 01 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 70 56 Reviews found online ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) X Ice Snow+: 40% × 70.4 + 60% × 69 (est.) = 70
Hakkapeliitta 01: 40% × 56.1 + 60% × 66.1 (est.) = 62
No owner ratings of comfort for X Ice Snow+. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No owner ratings of comfort for Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
65
Noise
Hakkapeliitta 01 +1075Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta 01 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 65 81 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) X Ice Snow+: 60% × 64.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 65
Hakkapeliitta 01: 60% × 81.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 75
No owner ratings of noise for X Ice Snow+ or Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Efficiency
No comparison52Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta 01 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 52
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin X Ice Snow+ | Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 67 |
| Dry | 62 | 54 |
| Wet | 71 | 71 |
| Snow | 68 | 75 |
| Comfort | 70 | 62 |
| Noise | 65 | 75 |
| Efficiency | – | 52 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
X Ice Snow+
Hakkapeliitta 01
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | X Ice Snow+ | Hakkapeliitta 01 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ice Traction | Snow | 100% #1/3 · 2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tyre Test | 81% #2/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 96% #3/3 · 2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling (tester's mark) | Snow | 86% #2/3 · 2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tyre Test | 100% #12/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 97% #2/3 · 2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tyre Test | 40% #16/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 88% #3/3 · 2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Road Rating (tester's mark) | Other | 100% #1/3 · 2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tyre Test | 30% #17/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/3 2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tyre Test | #1/6 2027 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin X Ice Snow+ | B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 90 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11.5/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin X Ice Snow+
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01
Too close to call: Michelin X Ice Snow+ and Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 are within 2 points overall. Michelin X Ice Snow+ is stronger on dry and comfort. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 is stronger on noise and snow. Michelin X Ice Snow+ rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 0 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 scores 75 vs 65 on noise.
Michelin X Ice Snow+ scores 62 vs 54 on dry.
Michelin X Ice Snow+ scores 70 vs 62 on comfort.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 scores 75 vs 68 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
X Ice Snow+ or Hakkapeliitta 01?
Which is better in the wet, X Ice Snow+ or Hakkapeliitta 01?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, X Ice Snow+ or Hakkapeliitta 01?
Michelin X Ice Snow+, 62 vs 54 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, X Ice Snow+ or Hakkapeliitta 01?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01, 75 vs 68 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, X Ice Snow+ or Hakkapeliitta 01?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01, 75 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, X Ice Snow+ or Hakkapeliitta 01?
Michelin X Ice Snow+, 70 vs 62 on our comfort score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology