Head-to-head Updated

Michelin X Ice Snow vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 13 + 2 road tests and 20 + 21 owner reviews. How we score

X Ice Snow leads, 73–71 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin X Ice Snow
Tire AMichelin

X Ice Snow

Winter

± 5

Tests 70 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 20 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (comfort (tester's mark))

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV
± 7

Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 74 · 21 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 (snow handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 10 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 2 tests6570
    Reviews found online7167

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 70.8 = 67

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV: 60% × 69.6 + 40% × 66.8 = 68

  2. 71

    Wet

    X Ice Snow +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 10 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 2 tests6563
    Reviews found online7979

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 64.8 + 40% × 79.3 = 71

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV: 60% × 62.6 + 40% × 79.1 = 69

  3. 76

    Snow

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV +5
    81
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 10 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 2 tests7381
    Reviews found online8182

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 81.2 = 76

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV: 60% × 81 + 40% × 81.9 = 81

  4. 80

    Comfort

    X Ice Snow +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 10 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests81≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7972

    X Ice Snow: 40% × 80.6 + 60% × 78.8 = 80

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 71.5 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 75

    Noise

    X Ice Snow +15
    60
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 10 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 2 tests8062
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)57

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 75

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV: 60% × 61.7 + 40% × 56.7 = 60

    No owner ratings of noise for X Ice Snow. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    X Ice Snow +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 10 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8178

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.4 = 76

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for X Ice Snow. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    X Ice Snow +8
    67
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 10 SUV
    Reviews found online7567
  8. 77

    Efficiency

    X Ice Snow +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 10 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 2 tests7774
Scores at a glance
Michelin X Ice Snow vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin X Ice SnowNokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV
Relative Score 73 71
Dry 67 68
Wet 71 69
Snow 76 81
Comfort 80 71
Noise 75 60
Treadwear 76 73
Handling (owners) 75 67
Efficiency 77 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

X Ice Snow

± 7

Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 10 SUVΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 81% #10/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 95% #4/8 · 2022 Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 78% #5/14 · 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test 80% #4/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 75% #3/7 · 2025 NAF Motor Studless Winter Tire Test R17 92% #8/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 72% #10/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 87% #7/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 95% #6/14 · 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test 99% #5/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 – Different tests
Ice Handling Snow 95% #5/7 · 2025 NAF Motor Studless Winter Tire Test R17 100% #1/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 – Different tests
Ice Traction Snow 99% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 86% #8/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 96% #6/7 · 2025 NAF Motor Studless Winter Tire Test R17 99% #3/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 – Different tests
Noise Noise 99% #7/8 · 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test 97% #5/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 – Different tests
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 100% #1/20 · 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test 97% #3/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 50% #14/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test 69% #7/8 · 2022 Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #7/10 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test #1/8 The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A X Ice Snow

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow, packed snow, and slush
  • High confidence and predictable handling on icy and freezing roads
  • Impressive tread wear longevity and minimal wear over multiple seasons

Cons

  • Average performance on dry and wet pavement compared to dedicated non-winter tires
  • Slightly noisier on dry pavement as the tread wears down
  • Can feel slightly twitchy at the limit or less comfortable than older X-Ice generations
All owner themes in the X Ice Snow review

Tire B Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip on ice and hard-packed snow
  • Short braking distances and reliable stopping power in winter conditions
  • Drivability and control restored in extreme mountainous or northern winter climates

Cons

  • Increased cabin noise due to the metal studs
  • Squirmy feel and sidewall flex on dry pavement
  • Reduction in fuel economy
All owner themes in the Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin X Ice Snow B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available10049
Rim diameters13″ – 21″16″ – 22″
Tread depth—12/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common88

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin X Ice Snow

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV

Narrow edge: Michelin X Ice Snow — better noise, comfort and handling. Pick the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 75 vs 60 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 80 vs 71 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 75 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV scores 81 vs 76 on snow.

Tire A · Michelin X Ice Snow
Tire B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV, 81 vs 76 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 75 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 80 vs 71 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 76 vs 73 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 77 vs 74 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology