Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin X Ice Snow vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 13 + 0 road tests and 19 + 1 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin X Ice Snow
Tire AMichelin

X Ice Snow

Winter

± 5

Tests 70 · 13 tests Owners 79 · 19 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (comfort (tester's mark))

Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c
Tire BYokohama

iceGUARD iG52c

Premium Touring Winter tire

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowiceGUARD iG52c
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests65–
    Reviews found online72–

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 72.2 = 68

  2. 71

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowiceGUARD iG52c
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests64–
    Reviews found online81–

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 80.6 = 71

  3. 77

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowiceGUARD iG52c
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests73–
    Reviews found online82–

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 81.8 = 77

  4. 81

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowiceGUARD iG52c
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests82–
    Reviews found online80–

    X Ice Snow: 40% × 82.3 + 60% × 80 = 81

  5. 75

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowiceGUARD iG52c
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests81–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 75

    No owner ratings of noise for X Ice Snow. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowiceGUARD iG52c
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)–
    Reviews found online83–

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 76

    No road tests of treadwear for X Ice Snow. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 76

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowiceGUARD iG52c
    Reviews found online76–
  8. 77

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowiceGUARD iG52c
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests77–
Scores at a glance
Michelin X Ice Snow vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin X Ice SnowYokohama iceGUARD iG52c
Relative Score 74 –
Dry 68 –
Wet 71 –
Snow 77 –
Comfort 81 –
Noise 75 –
Treadwear 76 –
Handling (owners) 76 –
Efficiency 77 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

X Ice Snow

iceGUARD iG52c

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryX Ice SnowiceGUARD iG52cΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/10 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test #14/17 2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A X Ice Snow

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and lateral grip in deep snow and slush
  • High level of confidence and stability on icy surfaces
  • Excellent tread life and durability over multiple seasons

Cons

  • Average performance and handling on dry or wet pavement
  • Increased road noise as the tires wear over time
  • Can feel slightly 'twitchy' or less stable at the absolute limit of handling
All owner themes in the X Ice Snow review

Tire B iceGUARD iG52c

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin X Ice Snow B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c
CategoryWinterPremium Touring Winter tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available100—
Rim diameters13″ – 21″—
Tread depth—11/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin X Ice Snow

Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c

Only Michelin X Ice Snow has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Michelin X Ice Snow
Tire B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology