Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 36 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N Blue ECO vs Yokohama A.Drive — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 28 owner reviews. How we score
N Blue ECO leads, 66–62 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
N Blue ECO +561Why this score
Source N Blue ECO A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 66 58 N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66
A.Drive: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61
No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
69
Wet
N Blue ECO +762Why this score
Source N Blue ECO A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 69 59 N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69
A.Drive: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62
No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
66
Comfort
N Blue ECO +264Why this score
Source N Blue ECO A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 63 58 N Blue ECO: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66
A.Drive: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 64
No road tests of comfort for N Blue ECO or A.Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Treadwear
A.Drive +565Why this score
Source N Blue ECO A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 56 64 N Blue ECO: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60
A.Drive: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
66
Handling (owners)
N Blue ECO +759Why this score
Source N Blue ECO A.Drive Reviews found online 66 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Blue ECO | Yokohama A.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 62 |
| Dry | 66 | 61 |
| Wet | 69 | 62 |
| Comfort | 66 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
N Blue ECO
62
/ 100
A.Drive
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Blue ECO
Pros
- Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
- Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
- Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise
Cons
- Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
- Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
- Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
Tire B A.Drive
Pros
- Competitive price point offering good value for money
- Reliable and predictable grip in dry road conditions
- Solid durability and tread life for many users
Cons
- Significant issues with wet-weather traction and aquaplaning
- High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
- Inconsistent tread wear performance across different driving styles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Blue ECO | B · Yokohama A.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 24 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 16″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Nexen N Blue ECO
62
/ 100
Yokohama A.Drive
Narrow edge: Nexen N Blue ECO — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Yokohama A.Drive if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 69 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 59 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 61 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama A.Drive scores 65 vs 60 on treadwear.
Tire A · Nexen N Blue ECO
Tire B · Yokohama A.Drive
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Blue ECO or A.Drive?
Which is better in the wet, N Blue ECO or A.Drive?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 69 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Blue ECO or A.Drive?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, N Blue ECO or A.Drive?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, N Blue ECO or A.Drive?
Yokohama A.Drive, 65 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology