tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N Blue HD vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 14 + 165 owner reviews. How we score

N Fera SU1 is ahead, 63–56

Check price on Amazon · N Fera SU1 or N Blue HD on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Blue HD
Tire ANexen

N Blue HD

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 14 reviews

Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire BNexen

N Fera SU1

Summer

± 8

Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 62 · 165 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 56

    Dry

    N Fera SU1 +2
    58
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue HDN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 60 (est.)55
    Reviews found online4964

    N Blue HD: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 56

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 63.7 = 58

    No road tests of dry for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 61

    Wet

    N Fera SU1 +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue HDN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 64 (est.)62
    Reviews found online5867

    N Blue HD: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 62.2 + 40% × 67.1 = 64

    No road tests of wet for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue HDN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online–49

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 58

    No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 51

    Comfort

    N Fera SU1 +14
    65
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue HDN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 64 (est.)66
    Reviews found online4365

    N Blue HD: 40% × 63.5 (est.) + 60% × 43.2 = 51

    N Fera SU1: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 65 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue HDN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–69
    Reviews found online–70

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 69.5 = 69

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    N Fera SU1 +12
    66
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue HDN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 59 (est.)70
    Reviews found online4659

    N Blue HD: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 54

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59.4 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 47

    Handling (owners)

    N Fera SU1 +19
    66
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue HDN Fera SU1
    Reviews found online4766
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue HDN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–76
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen N Blue HDNexen N Fera SU1
Relative Score 56 63
Dry 56 58
Wet 61 64
Snow – 58
Comfort 51 65
Noise – 69
Treadwear 54 66
Handling (owners) 47 66
Efficiency – 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N Blue HD

± 8

N Fera SU1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryN Blue HDN Fera SU1ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #14/17 2014 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer Tyre Test #5/6 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N Blue HD

Pros

  • Good initial wet and dry grip when new
  • Attractive budget-friendly price point
  • Decent fuel economy and highway stability early in their lifecycle

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise as the tires wear down
  • Rapid degradation of grip in wet and dry conditions after initial mileage
  • Shorter than expected tread life, especially on front axles
All owner themes in the N Blue HD review

Tire B N Fera SU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
  • Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
  • Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
  • Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
  • Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
All owner themes in the N Fera SU1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Blue HD B · Nexen N Fera SU1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available597
Rim diameters15″ – 18″15″ – 24″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Treadwear warranty—25,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N Blue HD

Nexen N Fera SU1

Winner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N Blue HD rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 65 vs 51 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 64 vs 61 on wet.

Tire A · Nexen N Blue HD
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N Blue HD or N Fera SU1?

Which is better in the wet, N Blue HD or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 64 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N Blue HD or N Fera SU1?

Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 58 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, N Blue HD or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 65 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N Blue HD or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology