Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N Fera AU5 vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 6 + 6,409 owner reviews. How we score

ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS is ahead, 79–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Fera AU5
Tire ANexen

N Fera AU5

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 6 reviews

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
± 5

Tests 76 · 3 tests Owners 82 · 6,409 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (ice braking)

“I ran the dws on my 700whp corvette ZR1 for 5 years . Never a problem and wear really good . I’ve tracked them in the qtr mile and roll racing . They hooked pretty good ls at the track . Had a 1.60 sixty foot on them”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +26
    80
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 59 (est.)75
    Reviews found online4688

    N Fera AU5: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.2 = 54

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 87.7 = 80

    No road tests of dry for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 55

    Wet

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +27
    82
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 59 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5092

    N Fera AU5: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 55

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 91.7 = 82

    No road tests of wet for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    77
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–80
    Reviews found online–72

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 80.4 + 40% × 72 = 77

  4. 61

    Comfort

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +19
    80
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 67 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5784

    N Fera AU5: 40% × 66.9 (est.) + 60% × 56.9 = 61

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 40% × 74.9 + 60% × 83.6 = 80

    No road tests of comfort for N Fera AU5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–71
    Reviews found online–80

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 79.7 = 75

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +12
    69
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5171

    N Fera AU5: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +29
    83
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Reviews found online5483
Scores at a glance
Nexen N Fera AU5 vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N Fera AU5Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Relative Score 56 79
Dry 54 80
Wet 55 82
Snow – 77
Comfort 61 80
Noise – 75
Treadwear 57 69
Handling (owners) 54 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N Fera AU5

± 5

ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N Fera AU5

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity, lasting multiple years of daily commuting
  • Very quiet and comfortable ride quality with smooth highway manners
  • Soft sidewalls contribute to high comfort levels even at higher tire pressures

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls lead to noticeable flex and reduced responsiveness in hard cornering
  • Lower dry grip levels compared to more aggressive performance tires like the Nexen N Fera SU1
  • Potential for traction loss or wheel spin during wet weather take-offs, particularly on powerful rear-wheel-drive vehicles
All owner themes in the N Fera AU5 review

Tire B ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Pros

  • Exceptional wet traction and resistance to hydroplaning
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality that transforms vehicle dynamics
  • Strong dry grip and responsive, predictable cornering capabilities

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter-than-expected lifespan for some drivers
  • Increased road noise and drone developing as the tires wear down
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a 'squishy' feel
All owner themes in the ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Nexen N Fera AU5

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Positive

The community widely praises the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus as a top-tier ultra-high-performance all-season tire, often comparing it favorably to Michelin competitors. Users frequently highlight its exceptional wet traction, comfortable and quiet ride quality, and surprising winter capabilities for an all-season tire. While a few note softer sidewalls or minor balancing quirks, the overall consensus is overwhelmingly positive regarding daily driving performance and value.

bobistheoilguy.com ·3 upvotes ·2025-01-17

“Yep the set on mine are approaching 5 yrs/50K miles since being put on and tread depth is averaging 4/32". Will be replacing them in the next few months and no doubt will go back with the same exact thing. Definitely the best performing/most even wearing tire I've had on any vehicle for decades regardless of brand.”

r/Porsche997 ·16 upvotes ·2026-10-14

“Got these for a steal I was looking for a 18 inch winter wheels set for my 997.1 S These came up and got them for $650 - full set with tires! Tires are Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus all-seasons - made in 0125 and have 90% thread on them. I was going to donate the tires and buy proper winter tires like Michelin Alpine, but google ai tells me these are better if the roads are clean so I might drive them when I put my summer tires away.”

r/Ioniq5N ·1 upvote ·2026-09-19

“I went with Superspeed RF05RR 19x9.5 ET33 5x114.3 CB73.1. I liked the RF05RR better than the RF06RR many others have gotten. For tires I got 275/45ZR-19 CONTINENTAL EXTREMECONTACT DWS 06 PLUS XL. Yes tire selection is limited, but these had good ratings and I am happy. My reason for going to the 19s was increased sidewall. The ride is so much smoother than the OEM 21s. Much quieter than OEM as well. No plans on track days or anything like that, just daily driving, so grip was not a concern. Yes, the clearance is tight, but they fit. Balance weights have to go on the inside, but not an issue. Have not regretted going to 19s.”

Top themes
#Wet Weather Traction#Ride Comfort and Noise#Winter and Snow Performance#Handling and Grip#Tread Life and Longevity#Michelin Comparison#Value and Pricing

Based on 139 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Fera AU5 B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—120
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—560 - 740 A - AA A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N Fera AU5

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N Fera AU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 83 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 82 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 80 vs 54 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 80 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · Nexen N Fera AU5
Tire B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N Fera AU5 or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Which is better in the wet, N Fera AU5 or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 82 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera AU5 or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 80 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, N Fera AU5 or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 80 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N Fera AU5 or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 69 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology