Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 6 reviews
Nexen N Fera AU5 vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 6 + 6,409 owner reviews. How we score
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS is ahead, 79–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 3 tests Owners 82 · 6,409 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (ice braking)
“I ran the dws on my 700whp corvette ZR1 for 5 years . Never a problem and wear really good . I’ve tracked them in the qtr mile and roll racing . They hooked pretty good ls at the track . Had a 1.60 sixty foot on them”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
54
Dry
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +2680Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 46 88 N Fera AU5: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.2 = 54
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 87.7 = 80
No road tests of dry for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
55
Wet
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +2782Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 50 92 N Fera AU5: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 55
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 91.7 = 82
No road tests of wet for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison77Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 80 Reviews found online – 72 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 80.4 + 40% × 72 = 77
-
61
Comfort
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +1980Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 57 84 N Fera AU5: 40% × 66.9 (est.) + 60% × 56.9 = 61
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 40% × 74.9 + 60% × 83.6 = 80
No road tests of comfort for N Fera AU5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison75Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 71 Reviews found online – 80 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 79.7 = 75
-
57
Treadwear
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +1269Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 51 71 N Fera AU5: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
54
Handling (owners)
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +2983Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Reviews found online 54 83
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera AU5 | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 79 |
| Dry | 54 | 80 |
| Wet | 55 | 82 |
| Snow | – | 77 |
| Comfort | 61 | 80 |
| Noise | – | 75 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 54 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
N Fera AU5
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Fera AU5
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity, lasting multiple years of daily commuting
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality with smooth highway manners
- Soft sidewalls contribute to high comfort levels even at higher tire pressures
Cons
- Softer sidewalls lead to noticeable flex and reduced responsiveness in hard cornering
- Lower dry grip levels compared to more aggressive performance tires like the Nexen N Fera SU1
- Potential for traction loss or wheel spin during wet weather take-offs, particularly on powerful rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Tire B ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Pros
- Exceptional wet traction and resistance to hydroplaning
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality that transforms vehicle dynamics
- Strong dry grip and responsive, predictable cornering capabilities
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter-than-expected lifespan for some drivers
- Increased road noise and drone developing as the tires wear down
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a 'squishy' feel
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Nexen N Fera AU5
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
The community widely praises the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus as a top-tier ultra-high-performance all-season tire, often comparing it favorably to Michelin competitors. Users frequently highlight its exceptional wet traction, comfortable and quiet ride quality, and surprising winter capabilities for an all-season tire. While a few note softer sidewalls or minor balancing quirks, the overall consensus is overwhelmingly positive regarding daily driving performance and value.
“Yep the set on mine are approaching 5 yrs/50K miles since being put on and tread depth is averaging 4/32". Will be replacing them in the next few months and no doubt will go back with the same exact thing. Definitely the best performing/most even wearing tire I've had on any vehicle for decades regardless of brand.”
“Got these for a steal I was looking for a 18 inch winter wheels set for my 997.1 S These came up and got them for $650 - full set with tires! Tires are Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus all-seasons - made in 0125 and have 90% thread on them. I was going to donate the tires and buy proper winter tires like Michelin Alpine, but google ai tells me these are better if the roads are clean so I might drive them when I put my summer tires away.”
“I went with Superspeed RF05RR 19x9.5 ET33 5x114.3 CB73.1. I liked the RF05RR better than the RF06RR many others have gotten. For tires I got 275/45ZR-19 CONTINENTAL EXTREMECONTACT DWS 06 PLUS XL. Yes tire selection is limited, but these had good ratings and I am happy. My reason for going to the 19s was increased sidewall. The ride is so much smoother than the OEM 21s. Much quieter than OEM as well. No plans on track days or anything like that, just daily driving, so grip was not a concern. Yes, the clearance is tight, but they fit. Balance weights have to go on the inside, but not an issue. Have not regretted going to 19s.”
Based on 139 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera AU5 | B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 120 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 - 740 A - AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N Fera AU5
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N Fera AU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 83 vs 54 on handling.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 82 vs 55 on wet.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 80 vs 54 on dry.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 80 vs 61 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Fera AU5 or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?
Which is better in the wet, N Fera AU5 or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 82 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera AU5 or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 80 vs 54 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, N Fera AU5 or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 80 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Fera AU5 or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 69 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology