tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N'Fera RU1 vs Vredestein Quatrac 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 6 road tests and 28 + 665 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac 5 is ahead, 72–65

Check price on Amazon · Quatrac 5 or N'Fera RU1 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N'Fera RU1
Tire ANexen

N'Fera RU1

Summer

± 8

Tests 61 · 3 tests Owners 67 · 28 reviews

Vredestein Quatrac 5
Tire BVredestein

Quatrac 5

All Season

± 5

Tests 73 · 6 tests Owners 70 · 665 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)

“A guy on YouTube vlogged his experience with the quatrac 5 in his mirage. It's a good all weather tire for the occasional blast of snow but is by no means a substitute for actual snow tires.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Quatrac 5 +11
    70
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 6 tests5472
    Reviews found online6668

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 54.2 + 40% × 66 = 59

    Quatrac 5: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 67.8 = 70

  2. 68

    Wet

    Quatrac 5 +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 6 tests6775
    Reviews found online7074

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67 + 40% × 70.2 = 68

    Quatrac 5: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 73.9 = 75

  3. 68

    Snow

    Quatrac 5 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 69 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6669

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 68

    Quatrac 5: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 69 = 70

    No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Quatrac 5 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6371

    N'Fera RU1: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63 = 65

    Quatrac 5: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 70.9 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU1 or Quatrac 5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    Quatrac 5 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests6773
    Reviews found online68≈ 66 (est.)

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    Quatrac 5: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Quatrac 5 +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 67 (est.)74
    Reviews found online6769

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67

    Quatrac 5: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 69.3 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    Quatrac 5 +7
    72
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Quatrac 5
    Reviews found online6572
  8. 52

    Efficiency

    Quatrac 5 +14
    66
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests5266
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen N'Fera RU1Vredestein Quatrac 5
Relative Score 65 72
Dry 59 70
Wet 68 75
Snow 68 70
Comfort 65 70
Noise 68 70
Treadwear 67 72
Handling (owners) 65 72
Efficiency 52 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N'Fera RU1

± 5

Quatrac 5

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryN'Fera RU1Quatrac 5ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 85% #14/15 · 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 96% #7/15 · 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 95% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 95% #6/7 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 90% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 80% #14/15 · 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 94% #12/15 · 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 97% #6/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 97% #15/15 · 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 74% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 81% #6/7 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 77% #3/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 74% #2/7 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #8/10 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test #14/15 2019 Autonavigator Summer Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N'Fera RU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium tier brands
  • High level of ride comfort and impact absorption over rough roads
  • Low road noise and quiet highway cruising

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by some users
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and vague high-speed handling
  • Mixed performance in colder temperatures or under hard acceleration
All owner themes in the N'Fera RU1 review

Tire B Quatrac 5

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in wet conditions and winter weather (snow and ice)
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Good year-round versatility eliminating the need for seasonal tire swaps

Cons

  • Faster or uneven tread wear reported by some users, particularly on the outer edges
  • Softer sidewalls can induce a 'squishy' feel or slight loss of steering feedback
  • Less aggressive dry-pavement handling compared to dedicated summer tires
All owner themes in the Quatrac 5 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Nexen N'Fera RU1

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Vredestein Quatrac 5

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Quatrac 5 is largely positive, with owners highlighting strong value, quiet comfort, and capable year-round traction. While recognized as a solid 3PMSF-rated all-weather tire, several users note that it cannot match dedicated winter tires in heavy snow and that tread wear can be rapid due to soft rubber compounds.

vwvortex.com ·2019-10-22

“They're both junk, but the Hankook is particularly poor in wet or snowy conditions. I replaced the Hankook tires on the S MT that my kids drive with Vredestein Quatrac 5s (on some 16 x 7 Passat wheels) and it was well worth the money.”
bobistheoilguy.com ·1 upvote ·2020-09-19

“I'm a big fan of their tires. I ran a few sets on an old Camry and they performed well in Northeast hills and 4 seasons. I currently have set of Quatrac 5's 225 60 18 on the Outback. Standing water could be better but it is good; dry pavement and traction is excellent; works very well with AWD in the snow. Only issue I've had to complain about is longevity with the softer compounds. But that's also a part of why it performs so well right?”
r/autoadvies ·7 upvotes ·2026-09-10

“Vredestein quatrac 5. Gaat vaker vervellen richting einde levensduur. Als het op 1 plek is en er geen canvas zichtbaar is loopt het niet zon vaart. Aan de andere kant zijn ze aardig op (en begint uitgedroogd/ verbrand te worden) dus zou ik ze binnenkort vervangen. Zeker ni het natte najaar en daarna de winter komt.”
Top themes
#Snow and winter traction#Tread wear and longevity#Affordable price and value#Wet and dry handling#Road noise and comfort#All-weather 3PMSF performance

Based on 93 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N'Fera RU1 B · Vredestein Quatrac 5
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4563
Rim diameters16″ – 20″13″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG320 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N'Fera RU1

Vredestein Quatrac 5

Winner: Vredestein Quatrac 5 — better efficiency, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Vredestein Quatrac 5 scores 66 vs 52 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Quatrac 5 scores 70 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Quatrac 5 scores 75 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Quatrac 5 scores 72 vs 65 on handling.

Tire A · Nexen N'Fera RU1
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac 5
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N'Fera RU1 or Quatrac 5?

Which is better in the wet, N'Fera RU1 or Quatrac 5?

Vredestein Quatrac 5, 75 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N'Fera RU1 or Quatrac 5?

Vredestein Quatrac 5, 70 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, N'Fera RU1 or Quatrac 5?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, N'Fera RU1 or Quatrac 5?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, N'Fera RU1 or Quatrac 5?

Vredestein Quatrac 5, 70 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N'Fera RU1 or Quatrac 5?

Vredestein Quatrac 5, 72 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, N'Fera RU1 or Quatrac 5?

Vredestein Quatrac 5, 66 vs 52 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology