Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N'Fera RU1 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 21 road tests and 28 + 1,244 owner reviews. How we score

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, 72–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N'Fera RU1
Tire ANexen

N'Fera RU1

Summer

± 8

Tests 61 · 3 tests Owners 67 · 28 reviews

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire BFalken

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Summer

± 5

Tests 77 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,244 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +15
    74
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 20 tests5480
    Reviews found online6666

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 54.2 + 40% × 66.1 = 59

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.5 + 40% × 66.4 = 74

  2. 68

    Wet

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +11
    79
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 20 tests6785
    Reviews found online7070

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67.1 + 40% × 70.3 = 68

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 85 + 40% × 69.6 = 79

  3. 68

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online66–

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 68

    No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    N'Fera RU1 +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 68 (est.)60
    Reviews found online6363

    N'Fera RU1: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 63.4 = 65

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60.1 + 60% × 62.5 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    N'Fera RU1 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 14 tests6766
    Reviews found online68≈ 67 (est.)

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 66

    No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 67 (est.)73
    Reviews found online6763

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63.3 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Reviews found online6565
  8. 53

    Efficiency

    N'Fera RU1 +22
    31
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 15 tests5331
Scores at a glance
Nexen N'Fera RU1 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N'Fera RU1Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Relative Score 65 72
Dry 59 74
Wet 68 79
Snow 68 –
Comfort 65 62
Noise 68 66
Treadwear 67 69
Handling (owners) 65 65
Efficiency 53 31

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N'Fera RU1

± 5

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryN'Fera RU1ZIEX ZE310 EcoRunΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 99% #2/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 99% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 95% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 97% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 90% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 93% #4/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 98% #4/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 97% #6/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 98% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 74% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 86% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 77% #3/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 72% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Grass Traction Off-road 91% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 84% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested – Different tests
Gravel Handling Off-road 97% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 99% #7/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Gravel Traction Off-road 97% #2/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 82% #10/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Mud Traction Off-road 88% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 88% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #8/10 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test #3/6 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N'Fera RU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium tier brands
  • High level of ride comfort and impact absorption over rough roads
  • Low road noise and quiet highway cruising

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by some users
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and vague high-speed handling
  • Mixed performance in colder temperatures or under hard acceleration
All owner themes in the N'Fera RU1 review

Tire B ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
  • Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Nexen N'Fera RU1

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Positive

Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.

Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency

Based on 5 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N'Fera RU1 B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4586
Rim diameters16″ – 20″14″ – 19″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG320 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common1818

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N'Fera RU1

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better dry and wet. Pick the Nexen N'Fera RU1 if efficiency and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 53 vs 31 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 74 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 65 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Nexen N'Fera RU1
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N'Fera RU1 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Which is better in the wet, N'Fera RU1 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N'Fera RU1 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 74 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, N'Fera RU1 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, N'Fera RU1 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Nexen N'Fera RU1, 65 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N'Fera RU1 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, N'Fera RU1 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Nexen N'Fera RU1, 53 vs 31 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology