Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N'Fera RU1 vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 31 road tests and 28 + 910 owner reviews. How we score

Azenis FK510 is ahead, 70–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N'Fera RU1
Tire ANexen

N'Fera RU1

Summer

± 8

Tests 61 · 3 tests Owners 67 · 28 reviews

Falken Azenis FK510
Tire BFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

± 5

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 910 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Azenis FK510 +14
    73
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 28 tests5473
    Reviews found online6674

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 54.2 + 40% × 65.9 = 59

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 74.2 = 73

  2. 68

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +16
    84
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 29 tests6788
    Reviews found online7078

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67 + 40% × 70.3 = 68

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 78 = 84

  3. 67

    Snow

    N'Fera RU1 +12
    55
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6545

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.9 = 55

    No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    N'Fera RU1 +9
    56
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 68 (est.)40
    Reviews found online6367

    N'Fera RU1: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63 = 65

    Azenis FK510: 40% × 40.1 + 60% × 66.9 = 56

    No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 67

    Noise

    N'Fera RU1 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 18 tests6766
    Reviews found online6867

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 67.7 = 67

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 = 66

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    N'Fera RU1 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 67 (est.)73
    Reviews found online6754

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    Azenis FK510 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Azenis FK510
    Reviews found online6571
  8. 52

    Efficiency

    N'Fera RU1 +2
    50
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU1Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 19 tests5250
Scores at a glance
Nexen N'Fera RU1 vs Falken Azenis FK510: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N'Fera RU1Falken Azenis FK510
Relative Score 65 70
Dry 59 73
Wet 68 84
Snow 67 55
Comfort 65 56
Noise 67 66
Treadwear 67 66
Handling (owners) 65 71
Efficiency 52 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N'Fera RU1

± 5

Azenis FK510

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryN'Fera RU1Azenis FK510ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 94% #7/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 97% #6/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 95% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 60% #9/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 90% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 98% #2/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 96% #6/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 97% #6/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 100% #3/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 74% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 60% #7/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 77% #3/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #8/10 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test #7/10 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N'Fera RU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium tier brands
  • High level of ride comfort and impact absorption over rough roads
  • Low road noise and quiet highway cruising

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by some users
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and vague high-speed handling
  • Mixed performance in colder temperatures or under hard acceleration
All owner themes in the N'Fera RU1 review

Tire B Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Nexen N'Fera RU1

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

r/CarTrackDays ·4 upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

r/Autocross ·1 upvote ·2023-12-18

“Funny, I just had this conversation in r/ecoboostmustang . I was in this exact boat when I first started out autocrossing. I got on 200 TW for 2020 but continued to HPDE on the daily summer tires. Indy 500 - Spring 2019 to Winter 2020 - These take an INCREDIBLE amount of abuse for the money. 30+ autocrosses, 2 HPDEs, 18,000 miles G-Max RS - Fall 2020 to Summer 2021 - Only bummer is they're directional, you technically shouldn't rotate. 10 HPDEs, 15,000 miles Falken FK510 - Spring 2020 to Summer 2020 - HARD NO from me. I corded a set in 10,000 miles between daily & 6 HPDEs.”

corvetteforum.com

“I've had a set of Falken Azenis FK510's on my car for a couple of months now, and just this past weekend took a trip through the twisties up to Prescott, and pushed the car as hard as I could heading up the mountain. I was a little nervous as I'd never used Falken tires before, but trusted in Tire Rack's reviews of them and pushed the envelope in every turn I hit. It was a pleasant surprise to find that the tires were gripping just as well as the much more expensive Michelin tires they'd replaced, and I even hit a personal best of .95g going around one of the more nasty turns. During this entire drive I never felt once like the tires weren't gripping perfectly, or that I was going to lose control from them breaking loose. Road noise is pretty much non-existent, and they seem to run pretty smooth over every surface I've driven them on so far. All-in-all I don't regret my purchase one bit, and if their longevity is anything like what I got out of my previous set of Michelins I'll definitely be buying another set once this one is done for.”

Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N'Fera RU1 B · Falken Azenis FK510
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4593
Rim diameters16″ – 20″17″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″10/32″
UTQG320 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi
Sizes in common1313

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N'Fera RU1

Falken Azenis FK510

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Nexen N'Fera RU1 if snow and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 84 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 73 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 67 vs 55 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 65 vs 56 on comfort.

Tire A · Nexen N'Fera RU1
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N'Fera RU1 or Azenis FK510?

Which is better in the wet, N'Fera RU1 or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 84 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N'Fera RU1 or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 73 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, N'Fera RU1 or Azenis FK510?

Nexen N'Fera RU1, 67 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, N'Fera RU1 or Azenis FK510?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, N'Fera RU1 or Azenis FK510?

Nexen N'Fera RU1, 65 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N'Fera RU1 or Azenis FK510?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, N'Fera RU1 or Azenis FK510?

Neither, by our numbers: 52 vs 50 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology