Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 16 reviews
Nexen N'Fera RU5 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
N'Fera RU5 leads, 73–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 68 · 1,241 reviews
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +175Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) – 78 Reviews found online 77 69 -
75
Wet
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +479Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) – 84 Reviews found online 77 71 -
60
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Reviews found online 54 – -
74
Comfort
N'Fera RU5 +1262Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) – 60 Reviews found online 80 65 -
69
Noise
N'Fera RU5 +366Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) – 66 Reviews found online 74 – -
70
Treadwear
N'Fera RU5 +169Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online 73 65 -
77
Handling
N'Fera RU5 +1067Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Reviews found online 77 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N'Fera RU5 | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 72 |
| Dry | 74 | 75 |
| Wet | 75 | 79 |
| Snow | 60 | – |
| Comfort | 74 | 62 |
| Noise | 69 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 69 |
| Handling | 77 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
N'Fera RU5
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N'Fera RU5
Pros
- Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to major competitor brands
- Impressive tread life and durability, with some users reporting high mileage and slow wear rates
- Strong grip and confident handling on both dry and wet roads
Cons
- Subpar traction and performance in snow and winter conditions, with specific complaints regarding ice and snow handling
- Noise levels are average, with some users noting they are not exceptionally quiet
- Mixed reviews on specialized winter-weather safety outside of mild rainy climates
Tire B ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
- Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Nexen N'Fera RU5
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Based on 5 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N'Fera RU5 | B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | 86 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 14″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 500 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N'Fera RU5
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Too close to call: Nexen N'Fera RU5 and Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun are within 2 points overall. Nexen N'Fera RU5 is stronger on comfort, handling and noise. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is stronger on wet.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 74 vs 62 on comfort.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 77 vs 67 on handling.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 75 on wet.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 69 vs 66 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.