Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 16 reviews
Nexen N'Fera RU5 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
N'Fera RU5 is ahead, 72–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 3 tests Owners 66 · 13 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
N'Fera RU5 +668Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 77 65 -
75
Wet
N'Fera RU5 +372Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 74 Reviews found online 77 69 -
60
Snow
Kinergy 4S +969Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 66 Reviews found online 54 73 -
74
Comfort
N'Fera RU5 +668Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 Kinergy 4S Reviews found online 80 67 -
69
Noise
N'Fera RU5 +861Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 57 Reviews found online 74 – -
70
Treadwear
N'Fera RU5 +763Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 62 Reviews found online 73 63 -
77
Handling
N'Fera RU5 +1463Why this score
Source N'Fera RU5 Kinergy 4S Reviews found online 77 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N'Fera RU5 | Hankook Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 67 |
| Dry | 74 | 68 |
| Wet | 75 | 72 |
| Snow | 60 | 69 |
| Comfort | 74 | 68 |
| Noise | 69 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 63 |
| Handling | 77 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
N'Fera RU5
Kinergy 4S
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N'Fera RU5
Pros
- Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to major competitor brands
- Impressive tread life and durability, with some users reporting high mileage and slow wear rates
- Strong grip and confident handling on both dry and wet roads
Cons
- Subpar traction and performance in snow and winter conditions, with specific complaints regarding ice and snow handling
- Noise levels are average, with some users noting they are not exceptionally quiet
- Mixed reviews on specialized winter-weather safety outside of mild rainy climates
Tire B Kinergy 4S
Pros
- Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
- Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
- Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
- Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N'Fera RU5 | B · Hankook Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | 67 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 500 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N'Fera RU5
Hankook Kinergy 4S
Winner: Nexen N'Fera RU5 — better handling, noise and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Kinergy 4S if snow matters most to you.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 77 vs 63 on handling.
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 69 vs 60 on snow.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 69 vs 61 on noise.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 70 vs 63 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.