tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N'Fera RU5 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 16 + 2,195 owner reviews. How we score

N'Fera RU5 is ahead, 71–65

Check price on Amazon · N'Fera RU5 or ADVAN Fleva V701 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N'Fera RU5
Tire ANexen

N'Fera RU5

All-Season Ultra High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 16 reviews

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,195 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 71 (est.)78
    Reviews found online7568

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 72

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 74

    Wet

    N'Fera RU5 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 73 (est.)70
    Reviews found online7664

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 74

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67

    No road tests of wet for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    N'Fera RU5 +24
    36
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online5212

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 60

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52 (est.) + 40% × 12.3 = 36

    No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    N'Fera RU5 +12
    62
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)62
    Reviews found online7661

    N'Fera RU5: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    Level
    69
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)75
    Reviews found online7460

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 69

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 59.7 = 69

    No road tests of noise for N'Fera RU5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    N'Fera RU5 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 70 (est.)75
    Reviews found online7559

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    N'Fera RU5 +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online7372
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen N'Fera RU5Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 71 65
Dry 72 74
Wet 74 67
Snow 60 36
Comfort 74 62
Noise 69 69
Treadwear 72 69
Handling (owners) 73 72
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N'Fera RU5

± 6

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N'Fera RU5

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to major competitor brands
  • Impressive tread life and durability, with some users reporting high mileage and slow wear rates
  • Strong grip and confident handling on both dry and wet roads

Cons

  • Subpar traction and performance in snow and winter conditions, with specific complaints regarding ice and snow handling
  • Noise levels are average, with some users noting they are not exceptionally quiet
  • Mixed reviews on specialized winter-weather safety outside of mild rainy climates
All owner themes in the N'Fera RU5 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Nexen N'Fera RU5

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.

r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N'Fera RU5 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategoryAll-Season Ultra High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available470
Rim diameters16″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″9/32″
UTQG500 A A300 A A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N'Fera RU5

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Nexen N'Fera RU5 — better snow, comfort and wet. Where the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Nexen N'Fera RU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 60 vs 36 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 74 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 74 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 72 vs 69 on treadwear.

Tire A · Nexen N'Fera RU5
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N'Fera RU5 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, N'Fera RU5 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N'Fera RU5 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, N'Fera RU5 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 60 vs 36 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, N'Fera RU5 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, N'Fera RU5 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 74 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N'Fera RU5 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 72 vs 69 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology