Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 62 · 164 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N Fera SU1 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 4 road tests and 164 + 2,192 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN Fleva V701 leads, 65–63 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,192 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
ADVAN Fleva V701 +1574Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests 55 78 Reviews found online 64 67 N Fera SU1: 60% × 55 + 40% × 64.2 = 59
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 74
-
64
Wet
ADVAN Fleva V701 +468Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests 62 70 Reviews found online 67 64 N Fera SU1: 60% × 61.9 + 40% × 67.3 = 64
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 64 = 68
-
58
Snow
N Fera SU1 +2434Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 49 (est.) Reviews found online 50 13 N Fera SU1: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 49 (est.) + 40% × 12.7 = 34
No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
66
Comfort
N Fera SU1 +462Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests 66 62 Reviews found online 66 62 N Fera SU1: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 65.5 = 66
ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.5 + 60% × 61.5 = 62
-
69
Noise
Level69Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 69 75 Reviews found online 70 60 N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 69.7 = 69
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 60 = 69
-
66
Treadwear
ADVAN Fleva V701 +369Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests 70 75 Reviews found online 59 59 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 62% 85% N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59.2 = 66
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 59.3 = 69
-
66
Handling (owners)
ADVAN Fleva V701 +672Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online 66 72 -
76
Efficiency
N Fera SU1 +571Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests 76 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU1 | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 65 |
| Dry | 59 | 74 |
| Wet | 64 | 68 |
| Snow | 58 | 34 |
| Comfort | 66 | 62 |
| Noise | 69 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 76 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
N Fera SU1
65
/ 100
ADVAN Fleva V701
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Nexen N Fera SU1 finished ahead 0 times and Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 2 times.
| Discipline | Category | N Fera SU1 | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 95% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 97% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 99% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 62% | 85% | −23.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 99% #2/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #14/22 | #6/22 | – | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Fera SU1
Pros
- Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
- Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
- Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
- Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
- Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
- Precise steering response and good road feedback
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Nexen N Fera SU1
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.
alltrac.net
·2025-04-09
“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”
fiestastforum.com
·2022-11-30
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
r/Civic_Type_R
·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU1 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 97 | 70 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 24″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 A A | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 25,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 58 | 58 |
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Nexen N Fera SU1
65
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Narrow edge: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better dry, handling and wet. Pick the Nexen N Fera SU1 if snow, efficiency and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 58 vs 34 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 59 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 72 vs 66 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want lower fuel or energy use
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 76 vs 71 on efficiency.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Fera SU1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Which is better in the wet, N Fera SU1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 68 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera SU1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, N Fera SU1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 58 vs 34 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, N Fera SU1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, N Fera SU1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Fera SU1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, N Fera SU1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 76 vs 71 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology