Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 80 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N Fera SU4 vs Yokohama A.Drive — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 80 + 28 owner reviews. How we score
N Fera SU4 is ahead, 75–62
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
N Fera SU4 +1561Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 80 58 N Fera SU4: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 76
A.Drive: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61
No road tests of dry for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
77
Wet
N Fera SU4 +1562Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 80 59 N Fera SU4: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 77
A.Drive: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62
No road tests of wet for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
73
Comfort
N Fera SU4 +964Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 77 58 N Fera SU4: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 73
A.Drive: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 64
No road tests of comfort for N Fera SU4 or A.Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
N Fera SU4 +365Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 70 64 N Fera SU4: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68
A.Drive: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
76
Handling (owners)
N Fera SU4 +1759Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 A.Drive Reviews found online 76 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU4 | Yokohama A.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 62 |
| Dry | 76 | 61 |
| Wet | 77 | 62 |
| Comfort | 73 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
N Fera SU4
62
/ 100
A.Drive
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Fera SU4
Pros
- Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
- Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
- Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
Tire B A.Drive
Pros
- Competitive price point offering good value for money
- Reliable and predictable grip in dry road conditions
- Solid durability and tread life for many users
Cons
- Significant issues with wet-weather traction and aquaplaning
- High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
- Inconsistent tread wear performance across different driving styles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU4 | B · Yokohama A.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Nexen N Fera SU4
62
/ 100
Yokohama A.Drive
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 76 vs 59 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 76 vs 61 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 77 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 73 vs 64 on comfort.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU4
Tire B · Yokohama A.Drive
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Fera SU4 or A.Drive?
Which is better in the wet, N Fera SU4 or A.Drive?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 77 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera SU4 or A.Drive?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 76 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, N Fera SU4 or A.Drive?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 73 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Fera SU4 or A.Drive?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology