Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 80 reviews
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N Fera SU4 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 80 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
N Fera SU4 leads, 75–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 31 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
N Fera SU4 +175Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 80 80 N Fera SU4: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 76
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
77
Wet
N Fera SU4 +869Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 80 69 N Fera SU4: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 77
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of wet for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison65Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 61 Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
73
Comfort
N Fera SU4 +568Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 77 67 N Fera SU4: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 73
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
No road tests of comfort for N Fera SU4 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison67Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 68 Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67
No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
N Fera SU4 +563Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 70 61 N Fera SU4: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
76
Handling (owners)
Advan Neova AD08 +379Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Advan Neova AD08 Reviews found online 76 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU4 | Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 71 |
| Dry | 76 | 75 |
| Wet | 77 | 69 |
| Snow | – | 65 |
| Comfort | 73 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 67 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
N Fera SU4
71
/ 100
Advan Neova AD08
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Fera SU4
Pros
- Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
- Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
- Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
Tire B Advan Neova AD08
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
- Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
- Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction
Cons
- Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
- Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
- Limited size availability for larger rims
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU4 | B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Nexen N Fera SU4
71
/ 100
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Narrow edge: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better wet, comfort and treadwear. Where the Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 77 vs 69 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 73 vs 68 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 68 vs 63 on treadwear.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU4
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Fera SU4 or Advan Neova AD08?
Which is better in the wet, N Fera SU4 or Advan Neova AD08?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 77 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera SU4 or Advan Neova AD08?
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, N Fera SU4 or Advan Neova AD08?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 73 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Fera SU4 or Advan Neova AD08?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 68 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology