Nexen CP641 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N Priz RH7 vs Nexen CP641 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 48 owner reviews. How we score

CP641 is ahead, 57–49

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Priz RH7
Tire ANexen

N Priz RH7

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 39 · 14 reviews

Nexen CP641
Tire BNexen

CP641

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 48 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 51

    Dry

    CP641 +4
    55
    Why this score
    SourceN Priz RH7CP641
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online4149

    N Priz RH7: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 41.4 = 51

    CP641: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55

    No road tests of dry for N Priz RH7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 52

    Wet

    CP641 +5
    57
    Why this score
    SourceN Priz RH7CP641
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online4552

    N Priz RH7: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 52

    CP641: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for N Priz RH7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 44

    Snow

    CP641 +14
    58
    Why this score
    SourceN Priz RH7CP641
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online2851

    N Priz RH7: 60% × 54.9 (est.) + 40% × 28.4 = 44

    CP641: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 58

    No road tests of snow for N Priz RH7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 52

    Comfort

    CP641 +6
    58
    Why this score
    SourceN Priz RH7CP641
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4352

    N Priz RH7: 40% × 64.4 (est.) + 60% × 43.4 = 52

    CP641: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 52.3 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for N Priz RH7 or CP641. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    CP641 +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceN Priz RH7CP641
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4959

    N Priz RH7: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 49.4 = 60

    CP641: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 64

    No road tests of noise for N Priz RH7 or CP641. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 46

    Treadwear

    CP641 +12
    58
    Why this score
    SourceN Priz RH7CP641
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online3453

    N Priz RH7: 60% × 54.8 (est.) + 40% × 33.6 = 46

    CP641: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58

    No road tests of treadwear for N Priz RH7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 40

    Handling (owners)

    CP641 +12
    52
    Why this score
    SourceN Priz RH7CP641
    Reviews found online4052
Scores at a glance
Nexen N Priz RH7 vs Nexen CP641: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N Priz RH7Nexen CP641
Relative Score 49 57
Dry 51 55
Wet 52 57
Snow 44 58
Comfort 52 58
Noise 60 64
Treadwear 46 58
Handling (owners) 40 52

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N Priz RH7

± 7

CP641

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N Priz RH7

Pros

  • Affordable value-priced option compared to premium brands
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Positive wet traction and handling reported by some users

Cons

  • Significant loss of grip and slippery behavior in wet conditions, leading to spin-outs or hydroplaning concerns
  • Poor performance in light snow and ice, particularly for rear-wheel-drive or 2WD vehicles
  • Some reports of premature structural degradation, such as the tire tearing apart after a few years
All owner themes in the N Priz RH7 review

Tire B CP641

Pros

  • Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
  • Impressive tread life and durability
  • Comfortable ride quality with low noise for many users

Cons

  • Poor wet weather grip and frequent slipping/aquaplaning
  • Excessive road noise or roaring reported by several users
  • Lackluster steering feedback and vague cornering confidence
All owner themes in the CP641 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Priz RH7 B · Nexen CP641
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available12—
Rim diameters16″ – 20″—
Tread depth10/32″10/32″
UTQG540 A A400 A A
Treadwear warranty—55,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N Priz RH7

Nexen CP641

Winner: Nexen CP641 — better snow, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N Priz RH7 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nexen CP641 scores 58 vs 44 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen CP641 scores 58 vs 46 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen CP641 scores 52 vs 40 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen CP641 scores 58 vs 52 on comfort.

Tire A · Nexen N Priz RH7
Tire B · Nexen CP641

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N Priz RH7 or CP641?

Which is better in the wet, N Priz RH7 or CP641?

Nexen CP641, 57 vs 52 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N Priz RH7 or CP641?

Nexen CP641, 55 vs 51 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, N Priz RH7 or CP641?

Nexen CP641, 58 vs 44 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, N Priz RH7 or CP641?

Nexen CP641, 64 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, N Priz RH7 or CP641?

Nexen CP641, 58 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N Priz RH7 or CP641?

Nexen CP641, 58 vs 46 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology