Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 12 reviews
Nexen N9000 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Nexen N9000 vs Toyo Proxes TR1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 12 + 903 owner reviews. How we score
N9000 is ahead, 69–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 66 · 903 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (comfort (tester's mark))
“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
N9000 +1059Why this score
Source N9000 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 53 Reviews found online 69 69 N9000: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69
Proxes TR1: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 69.3 = 59
No road tests of dry for N9000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
N9000 +468Why this score
Source N9000 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 73 70 N9000: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 72
Proxes TR1: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No road tests of wet for N9000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Comfort
N9000 +463Why this score
Source N9000 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 66 59 N9000: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67
Proxes TR1: 40% × 68.1 + 60% × 59.1 = 63
No road tests of comfort for N9000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison68Why this score
Source N9000 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 68 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 68
No owner ratings of noise for Proxes TR1. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
66
Treadwear
N9000 +363Why this score
Source N9000 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 66 60 N9000: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 66
Proxes TR1: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for N9000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TR1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
70
Handling (owners)
Proxes TR1 +272Why this score
Source N9000 Proxes TR1 Reviews found online 70 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source N9000 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N9000 | Toyo Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 64 |
| Dry | 69 | 59 |
| Wet | 72 | 68 |
| Comfort | 67 | 63 |
| Noise | – | 68 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
N9000
Proxes TR1
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N9000
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong wet weather traction and water evacuation capabilities
- Aesthetically pleasing tread pattern and sidewall profile
Cons
- Inconsistent reports regarding cabin noise levels
- Faster tread wear compared to premium-tier tires
- Soft sidewall construction limits suitability for track use
Tire B Proxes TR1
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and responsive steering feedback
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier-one brands
- Attractive and aggressive directional tread design
Cons
- Noticeable road noise and humming sounds at certain speeds
- Soft sidewalls that can cause a slight squirm or delayed initial steering response
- Rapid tread wear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear axles
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Nexen N9000
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Toyo Proxes TR1
Community sentiment regarding the Toyo Proxes TR1 is mixed, with users frequently noting an attractive price point and smooth, comfortable ride when compared to factory tires or run-flats. However, multiple drivers report shortcomings in wet-weather performance, cold grip, and road noise as mileage increases, while several criticize its soft sidewalls for creating imprecise handling at the limit.
“Bekomme ich mit unterschiedliche Reifen Modelle Probleme mit dem Verteiler Getriebe? Hallo, ich habe mal eine Frage bezüglich Reifen und dem Verteilergetriebe. Ich habe vor ein paar Jahren einen gebrauchten Felgensatz gekauft auf dem Reifen aus dem Jahr 2016 waren Profiltiefe der Reifen war bei allen neuwertig. Anfang diesen Jahres habe ich mir dann hinten links einen Platten gefahren. Ich habe dann die Reifen hinten achsweise getauscht mit dem selben Reifen was verbaut war (neue toyo proxes tr1 Reifen. Unglücklicherweise habe ich jetzt wieder einen platten Reifen, allerdings vorne. Nun wollte ich wieder 2 neue Reifen für vorne bestellen (ebenfalls toyo proxes tr1). Leider läuft dieses Modell wohl aus und sind nicht mehr verfügbar. Meine Frage jetzt, kann ich andere Reifen Modelle nutzen (toyo comfort in den selben Maßen wie den Proxes tr1) oder sind diese problematisch? Vielen Dank im Voraus 🙂 Read more”
“I had asymmetric 2 or possibly 3's on an impreza and they were a fantastic all rounder. The 5's will be going on my daily when i find a good deal!”
“70l46 did you get yours mounted and balanced for that price? I picked mine up at tiredealsforless.com for $765.12 shipped. They had the best prices that I have seen.”
Based on 36 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N9000 | B · Toyo Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 61 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N9000
Toyo Proxes TR1
Winner: Nexen N9000 — better dry, wet and comfort. Where the Toyo Proxes TR1 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Nexen N9000 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen N9000 scores 69 vs 59 on dry.
Nexen N9000 scores 72 vs 68 on wet.
Nexen N9000 scores 67 vs 63 on comfort.
Nexen N9000 scores 66 vs 63 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N9000 or Proxes TR1?
Which is better in the wet, N9000 or Proxes TR1?
Nexen N9000, 72 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N9000 or Proxes TR1?
Nexen N9000, 69 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, N9000 or Proxes TR1?
Nexen N9000, 67 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N9000 or Proxes TR1?
Nexen N9000, 66 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology