tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nitto Neo Gen vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 51 + 2,189 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 65–59

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Fleva V701 or Neo Gen on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nitto Neo Gen
Tire ANitto

Neo Gen

All Season Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 51 reviews

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,189 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +12
    74
    Why this score
    SourceNeo GenADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 64 (est.)78
    Reviews found online5867

    Neo Gen: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 62

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Neo Gen. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 62

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceNeo GenADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 64 (est.)70
    Reviews found online5964

    Neo Gen: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 64 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Neo Gen. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 47

    Snow

    Neo Gen +12
    35
    Why this score
    SourceNeo GenADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online3313

    Neo Gen: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 33.2 = 47

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 49.1 (est.) + 40% × 12.7 = 35

    No road tests of snow for Neo Gen. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceNeo GenADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)62
    Reviews found online5462

    Neo Gen: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 54.3 = 59

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.5 + 60% × 61.5 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Neo Gen. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourceNeo GenADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5660

    Neo Gen: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 62

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 60.1 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Neo Gen. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 60

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +9
    69
    Why this score
    SourceNeo GenADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 62 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5559

    Neo Gen: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 59.4 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Neo Gen. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 59

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +13
    72
    Why this score
    SourceNeo GenADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online5972
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceNeo GenADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryNitto Neo GenYokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 59 65
Dry 62 74
Wet 62 68
Snow 47 35
Comfort 59 62
Noise 62 69
Treadwear 60 69
Handling (owners) 59 72
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Neo Gen

± 6

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Neo Gen

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • Strong dry grip and cornering stability for spirited driving
  • Great value and affordable price point

Cons

  • Increased road noise at highway speeds
  • Firm or unrefined ride comfort
  • Soft sidewalls reported by some users affecting initial turn-in response
All owner themes in the Neo Gen review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Nitto Neo Gen

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.

fiestastforum.com ·2022-11-30

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
alltrac.net ·2025-04-09

“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nitto Neo Gen B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategoryAll Season Ultra High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2870
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth9.7/32″9/32″
UTQG280 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi
Sizes in common2222

Which one should you actually buy?

Nitto Neo Gen

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better handling, dry and treadwear. Pick the Nitto Neo Gen if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 72 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Nitto Neo Gen scores 47 vs 35 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 60 on treadwear.

Tire A · Nitto Neo Gen
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Neo Gen or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, Neo Gen or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 68 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Neo Gen or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Neo Gen or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Nitto Neo Gen, 47 vs 35 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Neo Gen or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Neo Gen or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 62 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Neo Gen or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology