Head-to-head Updated

Nitto NT555 G2 vs Yokohama Advan A10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 412 + 18 owner reviews. How we score

NT555 G2 is ahead, 59–52

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nitto NT555 G2
Tire ANitto

NT555 G2

Summer

± 7

Tests 60 · 2 tests Owners 58 · 412 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Yokohama Advan A10
Tire BYokohama

Advan A10

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 18 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 55

    Dry

    Advan A10 +2
    57
    Why this score
    SourceNT555 G2Advan A10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests49≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6451

    NT555 G2: 60% × 49.1 + 40% × 63.8 = 55

    Advan A10: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57

    No road tests of dry for Advan A10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 51

    Wet

    Advan A10 +4
    55
    Why this score
    SourceNT555 G2Advan A10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests48≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online5449

    NT555 G2: 60% × 48.3 + 40% × 54 = 51

    Advan A10: 60% × 58.7 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 55

    No road tests of wet for Advan A10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 48

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceNT555 G2Advan A10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)–
    Reviews found online33–

    NT555 G2: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 32.7 = 48

    No road tests of snow for NT555 G2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    NT555 G2 +25
    41
    Why this score
    SourceNT555 G2Advan A10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6528

    NT555 G2: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66

    Advan A10: 40% × 60.4 (est.) + 60% × 27.7 = 41

    No road tests of comfort for NT555 G2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Advan A10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceNT555 G2Advan A10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online64–

    NT555 G2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66

    No road tests of noise for NT555 G2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    NT555 G2 +30
    46
    Why this score
    SourceNT555 G2Advan A10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests83≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online6634

    NT555 G2: 60% × 83.3 + 40% × 66 = 76

    Advan A10: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 33.8 = 46

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan A10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    NT555 G2 +20
    42
    Why this score
    SourceNT555 G2Advan A10
    Reviews found online6242
Scores at a glance
Nitto NT555 G2 vs Yokohama Advan A10: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNitto NT555 G2Yokohama Advan A10
Relative Score 59 52
Dry 55 57
Wet 51 55
Snow 48 –
Comfort 66 41
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 76 46
Handling (owners) 62 42

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

NT555 G2

± 8

Advan A10

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A NT555 G2

Pros

  • Aggressive, visually appealing tread pattern and sidewall design
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands like Michelin or Pirelli
  • Long-lasting tread life and slow wear rates for a summer performance tire

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction, with multiple users reporting hydroplaning and a slippery feel in the rain
  • Lack of straight-line traction and wheel spin under heavy acceleration, especially on high-horsepower RWD vehicles
  • Subpar performance in cooler temperatures or cold conditions, requiring heat to grip properly
All owner themes in the NT555 G2 review

Tire B Advan A10

Pros

  • Exceptional dry weather traction and road-holding capabilities
  • High level of responsiveness and handling precision
  • Strong performance in warm, dry climates

Cons

  • Extremely short tread life with many reports of failure under 15,000 miles
  • High levels of cabin noise, particularly at speeds exceeding 50-65 mph
  • Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet, snowy, or icy conditions
All owner themes in the Advan A10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nitto NT555 G2 B · Yokohama Advan A10
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available885
Rim diameters15″ – 22″16″ – 18″
Tread depth10.2/32″—
UTQG320 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Nitto NT555 G2

Yokohama Advan A10

Winner: Nitto NT555 G2 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Yokohama Advan A10 if wet matters most to you. Yokohama Advan A10 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Nitto NT555 G2 scores 76 vs 46 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Nitto NT555 G2 scores 66 vs 41 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nitto NT555 G2 scores 62 vs 42 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan A10 scores 55 vs 51 on wet.

Tire A · Nitto NT555 G2
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A10

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

NT555 G2 or Advan A10?

Which is better in the wet, NT555 G2 or Advan A10?

Yokohama Advan A10, 55 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, NT555 G2 or Advan A10?

Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 57 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, NT555 G2 or Advan A10?

Nitto NT555 G2, 66 vs 41 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, NT555 G2 or Advan A10?

Nitto NT555 G2, 76 vs 46 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology