Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 43 reviews
Pirelli P Zero Nero GT vs Pirelli Powergy — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 43 + 1,813 owner reviews. How we score
Powergy is ahead, 68–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 1 test Owners 60 · 1,813 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“Pirelli cinturato P7 and Pirelli Powergy Hi all 👋🏼 So I had 4 Pirelli Cinturato P7’s on my Ford Focus ST. I got a flat tire (front left) while I was on vacation so I decided to get 2 new tires at the front. I asked the guy at the tire shop to get the same tires (so the Pirelli Cinturato’s). He got me Pirelli Powergy’s instead… He didn’t really speak English and there was not time as I was driving home the next day. So I just accepted it. Now my question is what’s the main difference between these tires? And does it matter I got 2 different tires now? (2 powergy’s at the front and 2 Cinturato’s at the back) Thanks!🙏🏼”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Powergy +871Why this score
Source P Zero Nero GT Powergy Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 60 62 P Zero Nero GT: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 63
Powergy: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 62 = 71
No road tests of dry for P Zero Nero GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
62
Wet
Powergy +971Why this score
Source P Zero Nero GT Powergy Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 59 65 P Zero Nero GT: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62
Powergy: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 64.9 = 71
No road tests of wet for P Zero Nero GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
57
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source P Zero Nero GT Powergy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) – Reviews found online 48 – P Zero Nero GT: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 57
No road tests of snow for P Zero Nero GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
54
Comfort
Powergy +963Why this score
Source P Zero Nero GT Powergy Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 48 56 P Zero Nero GT: 40% × 64.4 (est.) + 60% × 47.5 = 54
Powergy: 40% × 73.6 + 60% × 55.9 = 63
No road tests of comfort for P Zero Nero GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
63
Noise
Powergy +1174Why this score
Source P Zero Nero GT Powergy Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 57 ≈ 66 (est.) P Zero Nero GT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 63
Powergy: 60% × 79.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74
No road tests of noise for P Zero Nero GT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Powergy. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
48
Treadwear
Powergy +1058Why this score
Source P Zero Nero GT Powergy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 37 52 P Zero Nero GT: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 36.8 = 48
Powergy: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for P Zero Nero GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Powergy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
53
Handling (owners)
Powergy +962Why this score
Source P Zero Nero GT Powergy Reviews found online 53 62 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison74Why this score
Source P Zero Nero GT Powergy Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Pirelli P Zero Nero GT | Pirelli Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 68 |
| Dry | 63 | 71 |
| Wet | 62 | 71 |
| Snow | 57 | – |
| Comfort | 54 | 63 |
| Noise | 63 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 48 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 53 | 62 |
| Efficiency | – | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
P Zero Nero GT
Powergy
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A P Zero Nero GT
Pros
- Strong dry grip and predictable handling at the limit
- Competitive and attractive pricing compared to other premium brands
- Improved cabin quietness and ride comfort relative to some factory tires
Cons
- Unpredictable and poor wet-weather grip, leading to aquaplaning and sudden loss of traction
- Soft sidewalls resulting in a twitchy or wobbly feel under heavy cornering loads
- Persistent high-speed vibration issues that resist rebalancing
Tire B Powergy
Pros
- Significantly reduced road noise and quiet highway ride
- Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting
- Comfortable and smooth ride quality compared to run-flats
Cons
- Faster than average tread wear or shallow initial tread depth
- Negative impact on fuel economy (MPG) for some users
- Soft sidewalls leading to muted steering feedback and less precise handling at the limit
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Pirelli P Zero Nero GT
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Pirelli Powergy
Community opinion on the Pirelli Powergy is largely mixed, with the tire frequently viewed as an eco/budget, mid-tier option suitable for daily driving rather than high-performance use. While some users consider it a cost-effective, fuel-efficient choice from a reputable brand, others report negative experiences including excessive highway vibrations and potential sidewall defects. A significant number of discussions also revolve around general inquiries regarding safety, longevity, and whether it can be mixed with other Pirelli models.
“Pirelli cinturato P7 and Pirelli Powergy Hi all 👋🏼 So I had 4 Pirelli Cinturato P7’s on my Ford Focus ST. I got a flat tire (front left) while I was on vacation so I decided to get 2 new tires at the front. I asked the guy at the tire shop to get the same tires (so the Pirelli Cinturato’s). He got me Pirelli Powergy’s instead… He didn’t really speak English and there was not time as I was driving home the next day. So I just accepted it. Now my question is what’s the main difference between these tires? And does it matter I got 2 different tires now? (2 powergy’s at the front and 2 Cinturato’s at the back) Thanks!🙏🏼”
“Avg 29mpg on a 2015 Mazda 3 Sport Nav 2L 165bhp, any ideas? I've had this car for about 3-4 weeks now, posted it here on this subreddit too. So far, I've done about 800 miles and my average fuel consumtion seems to be around 29mpg - 10.2L/100km. The car doesn't have its original rims, its on **MAM RS3** 18" rims with Pirelli Powergy tires 215/45/R18 (internet says these tires provide good fuel economy). On longer trips the average is about 40mpg-45mpg which still seems a bit high. My work commute is about 2 miles, and I do occasionally drive in a spirited manner. Is this okay? Thank you all!”
“Ripples in side wall Just been washing the car and found what I can only describe as ripples in the side wall of my front-right tyre. Had these fitted in June, only just noticed the ripples. The other tyres are perfect. I’ve probably done around 2,000 miles on them. Should I be concerned, and do they look like a manufacturing defect, or as a result of damage? (I’ve not hit any serious potholes that I’m aware of). These tyres are Pirelli Powergy, fitted to a Volvo XC60. Date code is 3325. Any help gratefully received. Read more”
Based on 15 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Pirelli P Zero Nero GT | B · Pirelli Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 33 | 87 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 24 | 24 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Pirelli P Zero Nero GT
Pirelli Powergy
Winner: Pirelli Powergy — better noise, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pirelli Powergy scores 74 vs 63 on noise.
Pirelli Powergy scores 58 vs 48 on treadwear.
Pirelli Powergy scores 71 vs 62 on wet.
Pirelli Powergy scores 63 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
P Zero Nero GT or Powergy?
Which is better in the wet, P Zero Nero GT or Powergy?
Pirelli Powergy, 71 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, P Zero Nero GT or Powergy?
Pirelli Powergy, 71 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, P Zero Nero GT or Powergy?
Pirelli Powergy, 74 vs 63 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, P Zero Nero GT or Powergy?
Pirelli Powergy, 63 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, P Zero Nero GT or Powergy?
Pirelli Powergy, 58 vs 48 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology