Head-to-head Updated

Sumitomo BC100 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 70–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire ASumitomo

BC100

Summer

Tests 57 · 2 tests Owners 58 · 253 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 8 in 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test (straight aqua)

Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 59 · 2,183 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (noise)

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +20
    74
    Why this score
    SourceBC100ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)5577
    Reviews found online5469
    Dry Braking (% of best)96%97%
  2. 59

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +9
    68
    Why this score
    SourceBC100ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)5770
    Reviews found online6266
    Wet Braking (% of best)78%87%
    Wet Handling (% of best)96%95%
  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    36
    Why this score
    SourceBC100ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online–14
  4. 64

    Comfort

    BC100 +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceBC100ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–62
    Reviews found online5964
  5. 67

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBC100ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)6774
    Reviews found online–61
  6. 61

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBC100ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–74
    Reviews found online5861
  7. 56

    Handling

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +15
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBC100ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online5671
Scores at a glance
Sumitomo BC100 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701: scores by category (0–100)
CategorySumitomo BC100Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 59 70
Dry 54 74
Wet 59 68
Snow – 36
Comfort 64 63
Noise 67 69
Treadwear 61 69
Handling 56 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

BC100

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryBC100ADVAN Fleva V701ΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 96% #7/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout −1.3 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 91% #6/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +8.5 Different tests
Noise Other 99% #7/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −0.9 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 14% #7/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test 76% #6/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires −61.9 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 93% #5/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +0.1 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 78% #38/55 · 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview 87% #19/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −9.5 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 96% #6/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +1.8 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BC100

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Strong wet and dry grip for everyday commuting
  • Good water dispersion and confidence in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise reported by some drivers
  • Occasional understeer or reduced grip during aggressive cornering
  • Mixed experiences regarding longevity, with a few reporting faster-than-expected wear
All owner themes in the BC100 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Sumitomo BC100

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin

Based on 20 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Sumitomo BC100 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available11370
Rim diameters13″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Sumitomo BC100

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 54 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 68 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 61 on treadwear.

Tire A · Sumitomo BC100
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Leads

ADVAN Fleva V701

Amazon