Yokohama C Drive looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 vs Yokohama C Drive — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 116 + 45 owner reviews. How we score

C Drive is ahead, 71–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama C Drive
Tire BYokohama

C Drive

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 45 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    C Drive +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7073

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69

    C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 71

    No road tests of dry for HTR A/S P02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    C Drive +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6875

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 68

    C Drive: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for HTR A/S P02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 62

    No road tests of snow for HTR A/S P02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    C Drive +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6274

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 66

    C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for HTR A/S P02 or C Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 68

    No road tests of noise for HTR A/S P02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 53

    Treadwear

    C Drive +13
    66
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests45≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6467

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 44.8 + 40% × 64.2 = 53

    C Drive: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    C Drive +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02C Drive
    Reviews found online6672
Scores at a glance
Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 vs Yokohama C Drive: scores by category (0–100)
CategorySumitomo HTR A/S P02Yokohama C Drive
Relative Score 65 71
Dry 69 71
Wet 68 74
Snow 62 –
Comfort 66 72
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 53 66
Handling (owners) 66 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

HTR A/S P02

C Drive

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A HTR A/S P02

Pros

  • Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
  • Low road noise and comfortable, smooth ride
  • Responsive dry and wet handling

Cons

  • Tread life occasionally falls short of expected mileage warranties
  • Winter and snow traction is generally described as merely adequate or mediocre
  • Some complaints regarding balancing issues or slight hydroplaning in heavy downpours
All owner themes in the HTR A/S P02 review

Tire B C Drive

Pros

  • Excellent wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Predictable, progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from premature wear to high mileage
  • Some users report increased noise and stiffness as the tire ages
  • Mixed feedback on dry grip performance under aggressive driving conditions
All owner themes in the C Drive review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 B · Yokohama C Drive
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG600 A A—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Sumitomo HTR A/S P02

Yokohama C Drive

Winner: Yokohama C Drive — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama C Drive scores 66 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama C Drive scores 74 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama C Drive scores 72 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama C Drive scores 72 vs 66 on handling.

Tire A · Sumitomo HTR A/S P02
Tire B · Yokohama C Drive

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

HTR A/S P02 or C Drive?

Which is better in the wet, HTR A/S P02 or C Drive?

Yokohama C Drive, 74 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, HTR A/S P02 or C Drive?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, HTR A/S P02 or C Drive?

Yokohama C Drive, 72 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, HTR A/S P02 or C Drive?

Yokohama C Drive, 66 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology