Head-to-head Updated

Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 vs BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 116 + 1 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force COMP-2 A/S is ahead, 70–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Sumitomo HTR A/S P02
Tire ASumitomo

HTR A/S P02

All-Season tire

± 9

Tests – · 1 test Owners 66 · 116 reviews

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review

Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02g-Force COMP-2 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7071

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    No road tests of dry for HTR A/S P02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 69

    Wet

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02g-Force COMP-2 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6871

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 69

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    No road tests of wet for HTR A/S P02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02g-Force COMP-2 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online57–

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 62

    No road tests of snow for HTR A/S P02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02g-Force COMP-2 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6167

    HTR A/S P02: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 60.6 = 63

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for HTR A/S P02 or g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02g-Force COMP-2 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 68

    No road tests of noise for HTR A/S P02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 53

    Treadwear

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +17
    70
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02g-Force COMP-2 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests4577
    Reviews found online6460
    Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–147%87%

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 44.8 + 40% × 64.4 = 53

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 59.6 = 70

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceHTR A/S P02g-Force COMP-2 A/S
    Reviews found online6569
Scores at a glance
Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 vs BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategorySumitomo HTR A/S P02BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Relative Score 64 70
Dry 69 70
Wet 69 71
Snow 62 –
Comfort 63 68
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 53 70
Handling (owners) 65 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 9

HTR A/S P02

± 8

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 finished ahead 0 times and BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryHTR A/S P02g-Force COMP-2 A/SΔHead-to-head
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Treadwear 47% 87% −40.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #18/19 #4/19 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A HTR A/S P02

Pros

  • Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
  • Low road noise and comfortable, smooth ride
  • Responsive dry and wet handling

Cons

  • Tread life occasionally falls short of expected mileage warranties
  • Winter and snow traction is generally described as merely adequate or mediocre
  • Some complaints regarding balancing issues or slight hydroplaning in heavy downpours
All owner themes in the HTR A/S P02 review

Tire B g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 B · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
CategoryAll-Season tireUltra High Performance All Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″9 - 10/32″
UTQG600 A A400 AA A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi45,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure51 psi50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Sumitomo HTR A/S P02

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 70 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 68 vs 63 on comfort.

Tire A · Sumitomo HTR A/S P02
Tire B · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

HTR A/S P02 or g-Force COMP-2 A/S?

Which is better in the wet, HTR A/S P02 or g-Force COMP-2 A/S?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, HTR A/S P02 or g-Force COMP-2 A/S?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, HTR A/S P02 or g-Force COMP-2 A/S?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 68 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, HTR A/S P02 or g-Force COMP-2 A/S?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 70 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology