Head-to-head Updated

Sumitomo HTR Z III vs Yokohama AVID Ascend — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 42 + 80 owner reviews. How we score

AVID Ascend is ahead, 73–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Sumitomo HTR Z III
Tire ASumitomo

HTR Z III

Summer

± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 57 · 42 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Yokohama AVID Ascend
Tire BYokohama

AVID Ascend

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 80 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    AVID Ascend +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6876

    HTR Z III: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 73

    No road tests of dry for HTR Z III. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 63

    Wet

    AVID Ascend +14
    77
    Why this score
    SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online6180

    HTR Z III: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 60.6 = 63

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.6 = 77

    No road tests of wet for HTR Z III. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 36

    Snow

    AVID Ascend +32
    68
    Why this score
    SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 50 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online1466

    HTR Z III: 60% × 49.7 (est.) + 40% × 14.4 = 36

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 68

    No road tests of snow for HTR Z III. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    AVID Ascend +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6575

    HTR Z III: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66

    AVID Ascend: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 75.2 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for HTR Z III or AVID Ascend. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Noise

    AVID Ascend +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6376

    HTR Z III: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 70

    No road tests of noise for HTR Z III or AVID Ascend. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    AVID Ascend +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5973

    HTR Z III: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59 = 66

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    AVID Ascend +10
    76
    Why this score
    SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
    Reviews found online6676
Scores at a glance
Sumitomo HTR Z III vs Yokohama AVID Ascend: scores by category (0–100)
CategorySumitomo HTR Z IIIYokohama AVID Ascend
Relative Score 61 73
Dry 68 73
Wet 63 77
Snow 36 68
Comfort 66 73
Noise 65 70
Treadwear 66 70
Handling (owners) 66 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

HTR Z III

± 7

AVID Ascend

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A HTR Z III

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry handling and steering feedback
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather side grip during cornering
  • Limited traction under heavy acceleration on high-horsepower vehicles
  • Not suitable for winter or freezing conditions
All owner themes in the HTR Z III review

Tire B AVID Ascend

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and quiet ride
  • High level of ride comfort and shock absorption
  • Strong wet and dry traction, inspiring confidence in heavy rain

Cons

  • Isolated reports of premature tread wear or not meeting expected mileage
  • Slightly spongy initial feel requiring a brief break-in period
  • Occasional minor wheel slip during hard acceleration in wet or dry conditions
All owner themes in the AVID Ascend review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Sumitomo HTR Z III B · Yokohama AVID Ascend
CategorySummerPremium Touring All Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″12/32″
UTQG300 A A740 A A
Treadwear warranty—75,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Sumitomo HTR Z III

Yokohama AVID Ascend

Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better snow, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 68 vs 36 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 77 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 76 vs 66 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 73 vs 66 on comfort.

Tire A · Sumitomo HTR Z III
Tire B · Yokohama AVID Ascend

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

HTR Z III or AVID Ascend?

Which is better in the wet, HTR Z III or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 77 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, HTR Z III or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 73 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, HTR Z III or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 68 vs 36 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, HTR Z III or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 70 vs 65 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, HTR Z III or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 73 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, HTR Z III or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 70 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology