Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 11 reviews
Toyo A23 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 60 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
58
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +1270Why this score
Source A23 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 52 71 A23: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 58
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
No road tests of dry for A23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
57
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +1572Why this score
Source A23 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 53 73 A23: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 57
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72
No road tests of wet for A23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
56
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source A23 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) – Reviews found online 48 – A23: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 56
No road tests of snow for A23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
59
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +1372Why this score
Source A23 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 48 74 A23: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 59
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72
No road tests of comfort for A23 or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +1165Why this score
Source A23 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 46 65 A23: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for A23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
49
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +2473Why this score
Source A23 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 49 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo A23 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 70 |
| Dry | 58 | 70 |
| Wet | 57 | 72 |
| Snow | 56 | – |
| Comfort | 59 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
A23
BluEarth Es ES32
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A A23
Pros
- Solid grip and stability in dry conditions and on the highway
- Capable off-road and in muddy tracks for 4x4 vehicles
- Reasonable comfort and low road noise for some drivers
Cons
- Dangerous and slippery performance on wet surfaces and roundabouts
- Disappointing tread life and rapid wear reported by multiple users
- High road noise noted by some drivers
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo A23 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo A23
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo A23 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 49 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 57 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 59 on comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 70 vs 58 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
A23 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, A23 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, A23 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, A23 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, A23 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 65 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology