tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Toyo NanoEnergy 3 vs Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Too close to call: NanoEnergy 3 and Proxes CF2 SUV are level at 68.

Check price on Amazon · NanoEnergy 3 or Proxes CF2 SUV on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AToyo

NanoEnergy 3

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 1,120 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    NanoEnergy 3 +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourceNanoEnergy 3Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)–56
    Reviews found online6873
  2. 67

    Wet

    Proxes CF2 SUV +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceNanoEnergy 3Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)–66
    Reviews found online6673
  3. 70

    Comfort

    NanoEnergy 3 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceNanoEnergy 3Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)–62
    Reviews found online7079
  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceNanoEnergy 3Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)–74
  5. 68

    Treadwear

    NanoEnergy 3 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceNanoEnergy 3Proxes CF2 SUV
    Reviews found online6969
  6. 68

    Handling

    Proxes CF2 SUV +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceNanoEnergy 3Proxes CF2 SUV
    Reviews found online6873
Scores at a glance
CategoryToyo NanoEnergy 3Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Relative Score 68 68
Dry 68 63
Wet 67 69
Comfort 70 69
Noise – 71
Treadwear 68 67
Handling 68 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

NanoEnergy 3

Proxes CF2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A NanoEnergy 3

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noticeably low road noise
  • Great value for money and affordable pricing
  • Impression-worthy tread wear longevity and slow wear rate

Cons

  • Unpredictable or sub-par wet weather grip, leading to occasional sliding or hydroplaning concerns
  • Soft sidewalls that can compromise sharp turn-in response and cause tire flex during hard cornering
  • Reduced performance and hardening after extended use (over multiple years)
All owner themes in the NanoEnergy 3 review

Tire B Proxes CF2 SUV

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo NanoEnergy 3 B · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available4829
Rim diameters13″ – 17″15″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo NanoEnergy 3

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

Too close to call: Toyo NanoEnergy 3 and Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV are within 2 points overall. Toyo NanoEnergy 3 is stronger on dry. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV is stronger on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 68 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 73 vs 68 on handling.

Tire A · Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

68

Too close to call

NanoEnergy 3

Amazon