Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 54 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 54 + 1,120 owner reviews. How we score
NanoEnergy 3 leads, 69–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 1,120 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
NanoEnergy 3 +569Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 62 70 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64
NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 69
No road tests of dry for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
65
Wet
NanoEnergy 3 +368Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 63 67 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65
NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68
No road tests of wet for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Comfort
ComfortContact CC6 +270Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 73 71 ComfortContact CC6: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 72.8 = 72
NanoEnergy 3: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 70.5 = 70
No road tests of comfort for ComfortContact CC6 or NanoEnergy 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
NanoEnergy 3 +570Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 65 73 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 65
NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
63
Handling (owners)
NanoEnergy 3 +770Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 NanoEnergy 3 Reviews found online 63 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Toyo NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 69 |
| Dry | 64 | 69 |
| Wet | 65 | 68 |
| Comfort | 72 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
ComfortContact CC6
69
/ 100
NanoEnergy 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ComfortContact CC6
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
Tire B NanoEnergy 3
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noticeably low road noise
- Great value for money and affordable pricing
- Impression-worthy tread wear longevity and slow wear rate
Cons
- Unpredictable or sub-par wet weather grip, leading to occasional sliding or hydroplaning concerns
- Soft sidewalls that can compromise sharp turn-in response and cause tire flex during hard cornering
- Reduced performance and hardening after extended use (over multiple years)
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 48 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 17″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Continental ComfortContact CC6
69
/ 100
Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Narrow edge: Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — better handling, dry and treadwear. Where the Continental ComfortContact CC6 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 70 vs 63 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 69 vs 64 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 70 vs 65 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 68 vs 65 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ComfortContact CC6 or NanoEnergy 3?
Which is better in the wet, ComfortContact CC6 or NanoEnergy 3?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 68 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ComfortContact CC6 or NanoEnergy 3?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 69 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ComfortContact CC6 or NanoEnergy 3?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ComfortContact CC6 or NanoEnergy 3?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 70 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology