Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Open Country M/T vs General Grabber X3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 241 + 119 owner reviews. How we score

Open Country M/T leads, 68–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Open Country M/T
Tire AToyo

Open Country M/T

Mud-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 241 reviews

General Grabber X3
Tire BGeneral

Grabber X3

Mud-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 119 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Level
    69
    Why this score
    SourceOpen Country M/TGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7069

    Open Country M/T: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69

    Grabber X3: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Open Country M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Open Country M/T +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceOpen Country M/TGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7369

    Open Country M/T: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 72

    Grabber X3: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69.3 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Open Country M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Grabber X3 +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceOpen Country M/TGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6869

    Open Country M/T: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 69

    Grabber X3: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Open Country M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Open Country M/T +5
    58
    Why this score
    SourceOpen Country M/TGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6052

    Open Country M/T: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 59.7 = 63

    Grabber X3: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 52.1 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for Open Country M/T or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Noise

    Open Country M/T +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceOpen Country M/TGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6148

    Open Country M/T: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65

    Grabber X3: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 59

    No road tests of noise for Open Country M/T or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Open Country M/T +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceOpen Country M/TGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6563

    Open Country M/T: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 65

    Grabber X3: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Open Country M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    Open Country M/T +11
    53
    Why this score
    SourceOpen Country M/TGrabber X3
    Reviews found online6453
Scores at a glance
Toyo Open Country M/T vs General Grabber X3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Open Country M/TGeneral Grabber X3
Relative Score 68 66
Dry 69 69
Wet 72 70
Snow 69 70
Comfort 63 58
Noise 65 59
Treadwear 65 64
Handling (owners) 64 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Open Country M/T

± 7

Grabber X3

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Open Country M/T

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, gravel, and snow
  • Surprisingly low road noise and smooth ride quality for a mud-terrain tire
  • Rugged, durable sidewalls with high puncture resistance

Cons

  • High initial purchase price
  • Negative impact on vehicle fuel economy (MPG)
  • Reduced grip or slight slickness on wet pavement or icy roads
All owner themes in the Open Country M/T review

Tire B Grabber X3

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
  • Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering

Cons

  • Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
  • Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
  • Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
All owner themes in the Grabber X3 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Open Country M/T B · General Grabber X3
CategoryMud-Terrain tireMud-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available356
Rim diameters16″ – 24″16″ – 18″
Tread depth18 - 22/32″18 - 21/32″
UTQG—AA A
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Raised Lettering
Max pressure35 - 80 psi35 - 80 psi
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Open Country M/T

General Grabber X3

Narrow edge: Toyo Open Country M/T — better handling, noise and comfort. Where the General Grabber X3 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Open Country M/T scores 64 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Toyo Open Country M/T scores 65 vs 59 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Open Country M/T scores 63 vs 58 on comfort.

Tire A · Toyo Open Country M/T
Tire B · General Grabber X3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Open Country M/T or Grabber X3?

Which is better in the wet, Open Country M/T or Grabber X3?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Open Country M/T or Grabber X3?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Open Country M/T or Grabber X3?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Open Country M/T or Grabber X3?

Toyo Open Country M/T, 65 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Open Country M/T or Grabber X3?

Toyo Open Country M/T, 63 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Open Country M/T or Grabber X3?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology