Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews
Toyo Proxes CF1 vs Yokohama BluEarth AE50 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 46 + 36 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes CF1 is ahead, 69–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 54 · 36 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Proxes CF1 +564Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 70 53 Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
BluEarth AE50: 60% × 71.6 + 40% × 52.9 = 64
No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
Proxes CF1 +567Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 72 60 Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
BluEarth AE50: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 59.7 = 67
No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Comfort
Proxes CF1 +366Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 69 56 Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
BluEarth AE50: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 55.8 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Proxes CF1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 71 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) BluEarth AE50: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth AE50. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
62
Treadwear
Proxes CF1 +755Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 60 48 Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62
BluEarth AE50: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth AE50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Proxes CF1 +1257Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 BluEarth AE50 Reviews found online 69 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes CF1 | Yokohama BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 63 |
| Dry | 69 | 64 |
| Wet | 72 | 67 |
| Comfort | 69 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Proxes CF1
BluEarth AE50
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Proxes CF1
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
- Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
Tire B BluEarth AE50
Pros
- Strong wet and dry road grip for daily commuting
- High levels of ride comfort and smoothness
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear reported by many users
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and poor cornering stability
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes CF1 | B · Yokohama BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 28 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo Proxes CF1
Yokohama BluEarth AE50
Winner: Toyo Proxes CF1 — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 57 on handling.
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 62 vs 55 on treadwear.
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 64 on dry.
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 72 vs 67 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Proxes CF1 or BluEarth AE50?
Which is better in the wet, Proxes CF1 or BluEarth AE50?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 72 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes CF1 or BluEarth AE50?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Proxes CF1 or BluEarth AE50?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Proxes CF1 or BluEarth AE50?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 62 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology