tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes CF1 vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 46 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth XT AE61 leads, 71–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · BluEarth XT AE61 or Proxes CF1 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes CF1
Tire AToyo

Proxes CF1

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Tire BYokohama

BluEarth XT AE61

Summer

Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 EV Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    BluEarth XT AE61 +6
    75
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)70
    Reviews found online7083

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 71 (est.)68
    Reviews found online7280

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 79.5 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 69

    Comfort

    Proxes CF1 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)65
    Reviews found online6968

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 64.7 + 40% × 68.1 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes CF1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    79
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–87
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 79

    No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth XT AE61. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 62

    Treadwear

    Level
    62
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 64 (est.)53
    Reviews found online6075

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 75.4 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 69

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth XT AE61 +11
    80
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1BluEarth XT AE61
    Reviews found online6980
Scores at a glance
CategoryToyo Proxes CF1Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Relative Score 69 71
Dry 69 75
Wet 72 72
Comfort 69 66
Noise – 79
Treadwear 62 62
Handling (owners) 69 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Proxes CF1

BluEarth XT AE61

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes CF1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
  • Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
All owner themes in the Proxes CF1 review

Tire B BluEarth XT AE61

Pros

  • Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Responsive and sharp steering handling
  • High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction

Cons

  • Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
  • Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
  • Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
All owner themes in the BluEarth XT AE61 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes CF1 B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—38
Rim diameters—16″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes CF1

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — better handling and dry. Pick the Toyo Proxes CF1 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 80 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 75 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 66 on comfort.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes CF1
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes CF1 or BluEarth XT AE61?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes CF1 or BluEarth XT AE61?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes CF1 or BluEarth XT AE61?

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61, 75 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes CF1 or BluEarth XT AE61?

Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Proxes CF1 or BluEarth XT AE61?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 62 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology