Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 5 reviews
Toyo Proxes R32 vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 5 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth XT AE61 leads, 72–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 65 · 2 tests Owners 80 · 12 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 EV Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
BluEarth XT AE61 +275Why this score
Source Proxes R32 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 76 83 Proxes R32: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 73
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 83.4 = 75
No road tests of dry for Proxes R32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
69
Wet
BluEarth XT AE61 +574Why this score
Source Proxes R32 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 69 83 Proxes R32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 67.4 + 40% × 83.3 = 74
No road tests of wet for Proxes R32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
Proxes R32 +267Why this score
Source Proxes R32 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 64 Reviews found online 69 69 Proxes R32: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.4 = 69
BluEarth XT AE61: 40% × 64.4 + 60% × 69.3 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Proxes R32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
–
Noise
No comparison78Why this score
Source Proxes R32 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 86 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 78
No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth XT AE61. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
66
Treadwear
Proxes R32 +363Why this score
Source Proxes R32 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 53 Reviews found online 65 77 Proxes R32: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 53.3 + 40% × 76.9 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes R32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
76
Handling (owners)
BluEarth XT AE61 +682Why this score
Source Proxes R32 BluEarth XT AE61 Reviews found online 76 82 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison65Why this score
Source Proxes R32 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes R32 | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 72 |
| Dry | 73 | 75 |
| Wet | 69 | 74 |
| Comfort | 69 | 67 |
| Noise | – | 78 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 82 |
| Efficiency | – | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Proxes R32
BluEarth XT AE61
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Proxes R32
Pros
- Excellent steering precision and responsiveness
- Strong dry-weather grip and road feedback
- Quiet operation and high comfort levels
Cons
- Subpar traction and handling on wet surfaces
- Higher rolling resistance compared to competitors
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
Tire B BluEarth XT AE61
Pros
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
Cons
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes R32 | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 3 | 38 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | 220 A A | — |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo Proxes R32
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — better handling and wet. Pick the Toyo Proxes R32 if treadwear matters most to you. Toyo Proxes R32 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 82 vs 76 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 74 vs 69 on wet.
Toyo Proxes R32 scores 66 vs 63 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Proxes R32 or BluEarth XT AE61?
Which is better in the wet, Proxes R32 or BluEarth XT AE61?
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes R32 or BluEarth XT AE61?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Proxes R32 or BluEarth XT AE61?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Proxes R32 or BluEarth XT AE61?
Toyo Proxes R32, 66 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology