Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 4 reviews
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Toyo Proxes R39 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes R39 is ahead, 75–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
Proxes R39 +1661Why this score
Source Proxes R39 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 82 58 Proxes R39: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
No road tests of dry for Proxes R39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
75
Wet
Proxes R39 +1857Why this score
Source Proxes R39 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 77 53 Proxes R39: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 75
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57
No road tests of wet for Proxes R39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
73
Comfort
Proxes R39 +865Why this score
Source Proxes R39 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 77 62 Proxes R39: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Proxes R39 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Proxes R39 +565Why this score
Source Proxes R39 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 74 64 Proxes R39: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 70
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes R39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
81
Handling (owners)
Proxes R39 +2358Why this score
Source Proxes R39 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Reviews found online 81 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes R39 | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 61 |
| Dry | 77 | 61 |
| Wet | 75 | 57 |
| Comfort | 73 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 81 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Proxes R39
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Proxes R39
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and highway performance
- Favorable price-to-quality ratio
- Reliable handling characteristics on national roads and motorways
Cons
- Severe and premature tread wear reported by some users
- Wet grip is described as merely adequate rather than class-leading
Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros
- Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Adequate dry road grip and handling
Cons
- Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
- Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes R39 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo Proxes R39
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Winner: Toyo Proxes R39 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes R39 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Proxes R39 scores 81 vs 58 on handling.
Toyo Proxes R39 scores 75 vs 57 on wet.
Toyo Proxes R39 scores 77 vs 61 on dry.
Toyo Proxes R39 scores 73 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Proxes R39 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Which is better in the wet, Proxes R39 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Toyo Proxes R39, 75 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes R39 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Toyo Proxes R39, 77 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Proxes R39 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Toyo Proxes R39, 73 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Proxes R39 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Toyo Proxes R39, 70 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology