Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes R39 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes R39 is ahead, 75–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes R39
Tire AToyo

Proxes R39

Summer Premium Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Proxes R39 +16
    61
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R39Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online8258

    Proxes R39: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Proxes R39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Proxes R39 +18
    57
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R39Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7753

    Proxes R39: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 75

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Proxes R39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 73

    Comfort

    Proxes R39 +8
    65
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R39Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7762

    Proxes R39: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes R39 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 70

    Treadwear

    Proxes R39 +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R39Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7464

    Proxes R39: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 70

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes R39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes R39 +23
    58
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R39Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online8158
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes R39 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes R39Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 75 61
Dry 77 61
Wet 75 57
Comfort 73 65
Treadwear 70 65
Handling (owners) 81 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Proxes R39

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes R39

Pros

  • Excellent dry grip and highway performance
  • Favorable price-to-quality ratio
  • Reliable handling characteristics on national roads and motorways

Cons

  • Severe and premature tread wear reported by some users
  • Wet grip is described as merely adequate rather than class-leading
All owner themes in the Proxes R39 review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes R39 B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes R39

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: Toyo Proxes R39 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes R39 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes R39 scores 81 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes R39 scores 75 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes R39 scores 77 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes R39 scores 73 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes R39
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes R39 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes R39 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Toyo Proxes R39, 75 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes R39 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Toyo Proxes R39, 77 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes R39 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Toyo Proxes R39, 73 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Proxes R39 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Toyo Proxes R39, 70 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology