Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Proxes R39 is ahead, 75–69
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 63 · 1,457 reviews
“Quote: Originally Posted by AUaviator I'm having trouble finding these tires in stock. Rears are back ordered and only 1 front available and it's on tire rack. 22545/17 255/40/17. www.simpletire.com looks to have them instock with free shipping and a 60 dollar rebate. A little hard to find but search for them individually by size.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 4 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Proxes R39 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 82 |
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Proxes R39 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 66 | 78 |
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Proxes R39 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 28 | – |
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Proxes R39 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 65 | 77 |
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Proxes R39 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 66 | – |
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Proxes R39 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | – |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 74 |
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Proxes R39 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 71 | 81 |
| Category | Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 | Toyo Proxes R39 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 75 |
| Dry | 73 | 77 |
| Wet | 67 | 76 |
| Snow | 45 | – |
| Comfort | 67 | 73 |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 67 | 70 |
| Handling | 71 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Firehawk Indy 500
Proxes R39
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers frequently praising it as an exceptional value and budget-friendly alternative to premium summer tires. Owners report strong dry grip, solid wet-weather traction, good comfort, and predictable handling, though some note reduced performance in cold temperatures, softer sidewalls, and a tendency to get greasy during aggressive track sessions. Interest is also growing around the newer V2 version and its updated compound and tread design.
“I need a 224/45/15 I run these on my S2000 wheelset for driving around town and they are great. I also have used them for plenty of track days. They get a little greasy towards the end of sessions but have never let me down.”
“I have them on my 14 GT. 255 front/285 rear. They have roughly 5k on them and have worn well. Wheel spin has to be intentionally induced now. No more surprises. Highly recommend.”
“Will I regret buying Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s? I have a stock '21 GT Premium convertible with the black appearance package. It came with the upgraded Pirelli P Zero 255/40-19 tires, but with 35,000 miles, they are really worn, and I need new tires. I live in North Florida. We don't have a lot of cold weather (I missed the snow last month), but I do get a lot of rain. I don't track the car, and mostly drive on country roads and the interstate. The Pirelli's have treated me well as far as traction, dry and wet. I like the aggressive look of the Firehawks, but I am concerned about wet weather traction. Will the Firehawks be at least comparable to the Pirelli's for wet weather and general handling? If not, it sounds like the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 is the way to go. Also, the car is all black, with black rims, and the tires look wimpy. I'm not up for new rims this go-round, and I won't lower it because I like the clearance for potholes, etc., that I see a lot of in my area. I'm hoping the tires will help the look a little bit. Read more”
Based on 146 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 | B · Toyo Proxes R39 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 47 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 16″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 340 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Toyo Proxes R39
Winner: Toyo Proxes R39 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Toyo Proxes R39 scores 81 vs 71 on handling.
Toyo Proxes R39 scores 76 vs 67 on wet.
Toyo Proxes R39 scores 73 vs 67 on comfort.
Toyo Proxes R39 scores 77 vs 73 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.
